linux-hotplug.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ignore some specific interfaces, such as non-hotpluggable eth*,
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 21:03:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-hotplug-101285672914209@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-hotplug-101284314202868@msgid-missing>

> Although, I think pattern "ipsec*" should be configurable in
> /etc/default/hotplug (or /etc/sysconfig/hotplug on RedHat, maybe),
> does it make sense to apply such patch to net.agent?

Until the network device initialization model acquires some
consistency, I don't see a better solution than continuing to
add more special cases.  Which won't work in all cases,
but I think that won't be a risk for the "ipsec" interfaces
(132224) or ppp ones in the way it would be for "eth"
interfaces (108857).

FYI with 108857 I think the bug might best be fixed in
the "ifup" code:  if hotplug is doing its job, then that any
"ifup does modprobe" usage should expect that, and so
it should stop after the modprobe -- or find a way to tell
hotplug it should _in this case_ ignore that interface.

- Dave


> See more detail, look at http://bugs.debian.org/hotplug

    Some of those might better be redirected upstream,
    to the sf.net linux-hotplug bug database ... :)

>  #108857: hotplug should not invoke ifup ethX for built in interfaces
>  #132224: hotplug should ignor ipsec interfaces




_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list  http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel

      reply	other threads:[~2002-02-04 21:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-04 17:17 ignore some specific interfaces, such as non-hotpluggable eth*, ipsec* Fumitoshi UKAI
2002-02-04 21:03 ` David Brownell [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-hotplug-101285672914209@msgid-missing \
    --to=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).