From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: /sbin/hotplug invocation for USB devices in 2.5.40
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 17:02:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-hotplug-103409912704123@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-hotplug-103406277101783@msgid-missing>
Greg KH wrote:
> As almost no one noticed, I changed the environment variables that
> /sbin/hotplug is called with in 2.5.40 :)
I look at it just a bit differently ... where previously it only
issued calls for the first interface (typically that's all there is),
now it issues calls for every interface, _plus_ a call for a new kind
of thing never before seen through hotplug, a "usb device".
I really like the "event for each interface" change, though I'd
like it a bit better if we could tell this 2.5+ behavior apart
from earlier ones -- so hotplug agents can act accordingly.
Its that new type of hotplug event that makes recent kernels trigger
syslog messages about "Bad USB agent invocation".
> Now I know this overloads the existing DEVICE usage for USB devices, but
> I think we can determine what do properly (basically just test for
> DEVFS, and if it's not set, then we are looking at the driverfs entry
> for the device.)
I'd rather see these changes:
- This new parameter to every (!!) hotplug event gets renamed to
KFS_DEVICE (assuming that's the new driverfs name).
Hotplug agents will need to access KFS data *and* talk to the
device (and its drivers) using the DEVICE= path. Plus, if this
is present we know we don't need to ask 'usbmodules' to scan
other interfaces for us. (That often triggers other problems.)
- Don't make hotplug calls for USB devices until we have something
for them to do. (Essentially these are a new class of event.)
The example that comes to mind is policy agents using those
events to choose a non-default device configuration. But USB
needs a bunch of work before such things become practical.
I think both of those would be simple changes to make. They'd
greatly improve backward compatibility, while letting us do better
things on Linux Next Generation systems.
> I also created a lot of individual driverfs files for the USB device,
> basically everything that used to be specified by a environment variable
> in the call to /sbin/hotplug, is now a value in a file. So ideally, we
> can get rid of those other variables for the USB call, and just rely on
> the info present in driverfs.
That'd only work if both KFS_DEVICE and DEVICE are simultaneously available.
See above ... :) I wouldn't de-support the other parameters for quite
a while, though it's certainly good to have such improved flexibility.
By the way, what's the cost of a driverfs attribute on a 'struct device'?
Each USB device now has over a dozen of them.
- Dave
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-08 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-08 7:32 /sbin/hotplug invocation for USB devices in 2.5.40 Greg KH
2002-10-08 17:02 ` David Brownell [this message]
2002-10-08 17:49 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-10-08 17:55 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-10-08 18:14 ` David Brownell
2002-10-08 18:18 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-10-08 18:18 ` Greg KH
2002-10-08 18:25 ` Greg KH
2002-10-08 21:00 ` David Brownell
2002-10-08 21:17 ` Greg KH
2002-10-08 21:18 ` David Brownell
2002-10-08 21:28 ` David Brownell
2002-10-08 21:39 ` Greg KH
2002-10-09 15:15 ` David Brownell
2002-10-10 20:35 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-hotplug-103409912704123@msgid-missing \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).