From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: /sbin/hotplug invocation for USB devices in 2.5.40
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 18:18:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-hotplug-103410139407239@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-hotplug-103406277101783@msgid-missing>
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 10:02:59AM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> >As almost no one noticed, I changed the environment variables that
> >/sbin/hotplug is called with in 2.5.40 :)
>
> I look at it just a bit differently ... where previously it only
> issued calls for the first interface (typically that's all there is),
> now it issues calls for every interface, _plus_ a call for a new kind
> of thing never before seen through hotplug, a "usb device".
>
> I really like the "event for each interface" change, though I'd
> like it a bit better if we could tell this 2.5+ behavior apart
> from earlier ones -- so hotplug agents can act accordingly.
What needs to be different?
> Its that new type of hotplug event that makes recent kernels trigger
> syslog messages about "Bad USB agent invocation".
Hey, it's not my fault you have good error checking :)
Seriously, we're going to have to upgrade the hotplug scripts for 2.5
anyway, so this problem will go away soon enough.
> >Now I know this overloads the existing DEVICE usage for USB devices, but
> >I think we can determine what do properly (basically just test for
> >DEVFS, and if it's not set, then we are looking at the driverfs entry
> >for the device.)
>
> I'd rather see these changes:
>
> - This new parameter to every (!!) hotplug event gets renamed to
> KFS_DEVICE (assuming that's the new driverfs name).
I like Pat's suggestion of DEV_PATH. Does anyone object to this?
> Hotplug agents will need to access KFS data *and* talk to the
> device (and its drivers) using the DEVICE= path. Plus, if this
> is present we know we don't need to ask 'usbmodules' to scan
> other interfaces for us. (That often triggers other problems.)
Wait, why does anyone need to use the usbfs path (what is specified by
DEVICE= in the usb code)? All of the info that usbmodules used to get
is now present in DEV_PATH, right? If not, let me know.
> - Don't make hotplug calls for USB devices until we have something
> for them to do. (Essentially these are a new class of event.)
Why not? That lets us load drivers based on vendor and product id. The
interface specific calls let us load protocol specific drivers, giving
us a semblance of heirachy that a lot of people used to want a few years
ago (and Johannes provided a patch for a long time ago.)
And if the hotplug scripts don't want to do anything with this event,
it's quite easy to ignore :)
> The example that comes to mind is policy agents using those
> events to choose a non-default device configuration. But USB
> needs a bunch of work before such things become practical.
The USB core needs it? Or the hotplug scripts?
I'm curious about this, as I'm looking at a device that might need to
have it's second configuration enabled if it's running on Linux, yet the
default config is for when running on Windows.
> >I also created a lot of individual driverfs files for the USB device,
> >basically everything that used to be specified by a environment variable
> >in the call to /sbin/hotplug, is now a value in a file. So ideally, we
> >can get rid of those other variables for the USB call, and just rely on
> >the info present in driverfs.
>
> That'd only work if both KFS_DEVICE and DEVICE are simultaneously available.
> See above ... :) I wouldn't de-support the other parameters for quite
> a while, though it's certainly good to have such improved flexibility.
Well, with a rename to DEV_PATH that should work out fine.
Also, any reason to keep the DEVFS variable? It's wrongly named, and
doesn't look like anyone uses it.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-08 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-08 7:32 /sbin/hotplug invocation for USB devices in 2.5.40 Greg KH
2002-10-08 17:02 ` David Brownell
2002-10-08 17:49 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-10-08 17:55 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-10-08 18:14 ` David Brownell
2002-10-08 18:18 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-10-08 18:18 ` Greg KH [this message]
2002-10-08 18:25 ` Greg KH
2002-10-08 21:00 ` David Brownell
2002-10-08 21:17 ` Greg KH
2002-10-08 21:18 ` David Brownell
2002-10-08 21:28 ` David Brownell
2002-10-08 21:39 ` Greg KH
2002-10-09 15:15 ` David Brownell
2002-10-10 20:35 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-hotplug-103410139407239@msgid-missing \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).