linux-hotplug.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* BoF on hotplugging - summary
@ 2002-09-23 22:00 Oliver Neukum
  2002-09-23 22:14 ` Brad Hards
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Neukum @ 2002-09-23 22:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-hotplug

Hi people,

here's my summary on a BoF session during the recent Linuxkongress
in Cologne.

	Regards
		Oliver

BoF on USB and Hotplugging

Participants:
Brad Hards(USB), Tim Jansen(KDE), Oliver Neukum(USB), one unnamed and
largely silent GNOME coder and several other interested participants.
Unfortunately nobody of XFree was present.

Topics:

- definitions
- delivering events
- information needed by user space
- device numbers, names and associated stuff

Definitions: I remember nothing noteworthy

Delivering events:
General consensus was that there's nothing wrong in that regard.
The KDE and GNOME people would be quite happy with the hotplugging
scripts writing all information they have to a named pipe or something
similar. It seems that nobody really cares much about the exact mechanism.

A suggestion was made that a demon should be introduced. That was not discussed
fully. Later discussion with the X people which are to be continued shows
that the X people would want to introduce an X extension for device discovery
and notification issues.

Information needed by user space:
Items of consensus:
- physical path and all available device ids must be delivered
- groupings of devices must be delivered
- most crucial item: user space needs a mapping between physical and logical device
- user space wants a device _name_
- driverfs and the input layer must be documented

A partial solution to the issues was found.
There needs to be a second kind of hotplugging event that is generated
upon "associating" a device to a driver

Device numbers, names and associated stuff
Items of consensus:
- device numbers are a bad idea
- there needs to be some "dynamic element"

There was absolute disagreement over devfs.
Oppinions ranged from "devfs must go away" to "hotplugging without
devfs is obviously stupid"




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list  http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-11-06 18:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-09-23 22:00 BoF on hotplugging - summary Oliver Neukum
2002-09-23 22:14 ` Brad Hards
2002-09-23 22:58 ` Greg KH
2002-09-23 23:00 ` Greg KH
2002-09-23 23:15 ` Tim Jansen
2002-11-06 18:49 ` David Brownell

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).