From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 21:34:05 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC] /sbin/hotplug multiplexor Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 02:24:48PM -0700, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > > Personally, this is one reason why I'd much rather see a daemon-based model > where each interested daemon can "subscribe" to the messages it is > interested in. It's very possible (and likely, i.e. udev) that the steps > involved for the daemon to respond to the hotplug event are so lightweight > that creating a subprocess to handle them would be very wasteful. One of the hotplug programs will create a D-BUS message that anyone can subscribe to. But I don't want to add that to one of the existing hotplug programs, as it's a separate task. That's one reason for the proposed change. thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel