From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Love Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 21:45:54 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC] /sbin/hotplug multiplexor Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2003-04-14 at 17:24, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > Personally, this is one reason why I'd much rather see a daemon-based model > where each interested daemon can "subscribe" to the messages it is interested > in. It's very possible (and likely, i.e. udev) that the steps involved for the > daemon to respond to the hotplug event are so lightweight that creating a > subprocess to handle them would be very wasteful. This screams for d-bus. I spent the weekend reading about it and I spoke with some of the d-bus hackers. It is really neat and certainly something we should look into. See http://www.freedesktop.org/software/dbus/ Robert Love ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel