Re: Vosonic's X-Drive 2030

[Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas <plcl@telefonica.net>]

On Thursday 08 May 2003 00:17, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, 8 May 2003 00:18:33 +0200 Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas 
<plcl@telefonica.net> wrote:
> | On Thursday 08 May 2003 00:24, David Brownell wrote:
> | > >>>>>usb-storage          0x0000     0x0d7d   0x0240    0x0000      
> | > >>>>> 0x0000
> | > >>>>>
> | > >>>>>usb-storage          0x0003      0x7d0d  0x4002    0x0000      
> | > >>>>> 0x0000
> | >
> | > IF the byte order is wrong in "modules.usbmap",
> | > that'd be some kind of modutils bug...
> |
> | Sorry, but the bug was mine. We were talking about how to setup the
> | "usb.usermap" file, and my mistake was to use vendor and product ids from
> | lsusb directly. Later, i've checked the output from usbview, what is
> | right AFAIK.
>
> So there is no problem AFA you know?  with lsusb or modutils or usbview?
>
> If so, that's good news.

To clarify:
- usbview output is correct AFAIK. It parses "/proc/bus/usb/devices", then 
this file is also correct.
- lsusb output is wrong, as stated by the message from Alexander Kühn, and 
also from your ancient messages to the linux-usb-devel list. Maybe usbmodules 
(from usbutils package) is also wrong.
- I don't know about modutils, i don't have any data to think it can be wrong. 
The file "usb.usermap" is not generated by modutils at all. It's a 
hand-maintained file.

Regards,
Pedro

-- 
ALSA Library Bindings for Pascal
http://alsapas.alturl.com



-------------------------------------------------------
Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara
The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions
www.enterpriselinuxforum.com

_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list  http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel