* Question on 2.4.21 unusual_devs list.
@ 2003-09-09 19:17 Doug Maxey
2003-09-09 22:37 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Doug Maxey @ 2003-09-09 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-hotplug
Greetings,
I have an interesting situation with 2 different TEAC FD-05PUB-x59
floppy drives. The x59 designation is on the external device label,
the two samples in my lab are -159 and -259.
Both show the same descriptors, and both indicate they are C/B/I
devices according to lsusb.
However, depending on the value defined in the unusual_dev list,
currently US_PR_CB, I can only get the older -159 drive to
configure.
If the unusual_devs list is edited to show the supported protocol as
US_PR_CBI, and get the other device -259 configured, and not the
other.
This leads to my questions:
1) What is the the signifigance of the unusual_devs list. I am
infering the list exists to provide a way to configure devices
that do no precisely aggree with the protocol actually supported
2) if a given device is in the unusual_devs list, how does one also
define that it might show as the other, that is to say, correctly?
++doug
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: Question on 2.4.21 unusual_devs list.
2003-09-09 19:17 Question on 2.4.21 unusual_devs list Doug Maxey
@ 2003-09-09 22:37 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2003-09-09 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-hotplug
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 02:17:56PM -0500, Doug Maxey wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have an interesting situation with 2 different TEAC FD-05PUB-x59
> floppy drives. The x59 designation is on the external device label,
> the two samples in my lab are -159 and -259.
>
> Both show the same descriptors, and both indicate they are C/B/I
> devices according to lsusb.
>
> However, depending on the value defined in the unusual_dev list,
> currently US_PR_CB, I can only get the older -159 drive to
> configure.
>
> If the unusual_devs list is edited to show the supported protocol as
> US_PR_CBI, and get the other device -259 configured, and not the
> other.
>
> This leads to my questions:
>
> 1) What is the the signifigance of the unusual_devs list. I am
> infering the list exists to provide a way to configure devices
> that do no precisely aggree with the protocol actually supported
>
> 2) if a given device is in the unusual_devs list, how does one also
> define that it might show as the other, that is to say, correctly?
Please send the output of /proc/bus/usb/devices for these two devices,
and all of this email again, to the linux-usb-devel mailing list. The
hotplug list really isn't about USB specific stuff.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-09 22:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-09-09 19:17 Question on 2.4.21 unusual_devs list Doug Maxey
2003-09-09 22:37 ` Greg KH
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).