* [SOLVED] RE: Weird environment for usb-storage script?
@ 2003-09-17 17:36 Michael Hale
2003-09-17 18:19 ` Michael Hale
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Hale @ 2003-09-17 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-hotplug
Thanks Joerg,
I changed my usb-storage script to look like this:
#!/bin/sh
exec >/tmp/foo.$$ 2>&1
set -x
invoke-rc.d ssh start
eject
echo '#!/bin/sh
killall -9 sshd
eject -t' > $REMOVER
chmod 777 $REMOVER
...and it starts and stops the ssh server. Now I just need to read some
man pages and figure out what exec and set -x are actually doing :)
Thanks again, Michael
>-----Original Message-----
>From: linux-hotplug-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
>[mailto:linux-hotplug-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On
>Behalf Of Joerg Sommer
>Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 11:55 AM
>To: linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: Weird environment for usb-storage script?
>
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: [SOLVED] RE: Weird environment for usb-storage script?
2003-09-17 17:36 [SOLVED] RE: Weird environment for usb-storage script? Michael Hale
@ 2003-09-17 18:19 ` Michael Hale
2003-09-17 20:25 ` Joerg Sommer
2003-09-17 21:11 ` Michael Hale
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Hale @ 2003-09-17 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-hotplug
I am having trouble understanding what 'exec >/tmp/foo.$$ 2>&1' does. I
understand that $$ becomes my pid and that stdout and stderr are
redirected, but doesn't exec take a command? What am I missing? Also
why would my commands not run previously if they generated output on
stdout?
- Michael
>-----Original Message-----
>From: linux-hotplug-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
>[mailto:linux-hotplug-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On
>Behalf Of Michael Hale
>Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 1:37 PM
>To: linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: [SOLVED] RE: Weird environment for usb-storage script?
>
>
>Thanks Joerg,
>
>I changed my usb-storage script to look like this:
>#!/bin/sh
>
>exec >/tmp/foo.$$ 2>&1
>set -x
>invoke-rc.d ssh start
>eject
>
>echo '#!/bin/sh
>killall -9 sshd
>eject -t' > $REMOVER
>
>chmod 777 $REMOVER
>
>...and it starts and stops the ssh server. Now I just need to
>read some man pages and figure out what exec and set -x are
>actually doing :)
>
>Thanks again, Michael
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: linux-hotplug-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
>>[mailto:linux-hotplug-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On
>>Behalf Of Joerg Sommer
>>Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 11:55 AM
>>To: linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>Subject: Re: Weird environment for usb-storage script?
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
>Welcome to geek heaven.
>http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________
>Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
>Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [SOLVED] RE: Weird environment for usb-storage script?
2003-09-17 17:36 [SOLVED] RE: Weird environment for usb-storage script? Michael Hale
2003-09-17 18:19 ` Michael Hale
@ 2003-09-17 20:25 ` Joerg Sommer
2003-09-17 21:11 ` Michael Hale
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joerg Sommer @ 2003-09-17 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-hotplug
begin "Michael Hale" <michaelh@cipheroptics.com> wrote:
>>From: linux-hotplug-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
>>[mailto:linux-hotplug-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On
>>Behalf Of Michael Hale
>>Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 1:37 PM
>>To: linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>Subject: [SOLVED] RE: Weird environment for usb-storage script?
>>
>>I changed my usb-storage script to look like this:
>>#!/bin/sh
>>
add here: set -e to let the script die, if something returns with an
error.
>>exec >/tmp/foo.$$ 2>&1
>>set -x
>>invoke-rc.d ssh start
>>eject
>>
>>echo '#!/bin/sh
>>killall -9 sshd
>>eject -t' > $REMOVER
>>
>>chmod 777 $REMOVER
>>
>>...and it starts and stops the ssh server. Now I just need to
>>read some man pages and figure out what exec and set -x are
>>actually doing :)
But it shouldn't look so. This is only for debuging. Take a look at
/tmp/foo.?? and you see what commands were executed and you see how they
are called.
> I am having trouble understanding what 'exec >/tmp/foo.$$ 2>&1' does. I
> understand that $$ becomes my pid and that stdout and stderr are
> redirected, but doesn't exec take a command? What am I missing? Also
exec removes normaly the process by another. If exec is called without a
command to execute, all that happens to the current process. All output
of the current process (produced by set -x) is written to /tmp/foo.??
> why would my commands not run previously if they generated output on
> stdout?
I don't know why. This is, why you should add debugging output.
Jörg.
end.
--
Das Recht, seine Meinung zu wechseln, ist eines der wichtigsten
menschlichen Previlegien.
(Robert Peel)
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: [SOLVED] RE: Weird environment for usb-storage script?
2003-09-17 17:36 [SOLVED] RE: Weird environment for usb-storage script? Michael Hale
2003-09-17 18:19 ` Michael Hale
2003-09-17 20:25 ` Joerg Sommer
@ 2003-09-17 21:11 ` Michael Hale
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Hale @ 2003-09-17 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-hotplug
I added set -e and commented out exec and set -x. My cd still ejects,
but ssh fails to start. However when I used exec to send stdout to
/dev/null it starts ssh in addition to ejecting the cd. Here is the
script I currently have:
#!/bin/sh
exec >/dev/null 2>&1
invoke-rc.d ssh start
eject
echo '#!/bin/sh
killall -9 sshd
eject -t' > $REMOVER
chmod 700 $REMOVER
begin "Michael Hale" <michaelh@cipheroptics.com> wrote:
>>From: linux-hotplug-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
>>[mailto:linux-hotplug-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On
>>Behalf Of Michael Hale
>>Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 1:37 PM
>>To: linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>Subject: [SOLVED] RE: Weird environment for usb-storage script?
>>
>>I changed my usb-storage script to look like this:
>>#!/bin/sh
>>
add here: set -e to let the script die, if something returns with an
error.
>>exec >/tmp/foo.$$ 2>&1
>>set -x
>>invoke-rc.d ssh start
>>eject
>>
>>echo '#!/bin/sh
>>killall -9 sshd
>>eject -t' > $REMOVER
>>
>>chmod 777 $REMOVER
>>
>>...and it starts and stops the ssh server. Now I just need to
>>read some man pages and figure out what exec and set -x are
>>actually doing :)
But it shouldn't look so. This is only for debuging. Take a look at
/tmp/foo.?? and you see what commands were executed and you see how they
are called.
> I am having trouble understanding what 'exec >/tmp/foo.$$ 2>&1' does.
I
> understand that $$ becomes my pid and that stdout and stderr are
> redirected, but doesn't exec take a command? What am I missing? Also
exec removes normaly the process by another. If exec is called without a
command to execute, all that happens to the current process. All output
of the current process (produced by set -x) is written to /tmp/foo.??
> why would my commands not run previously if they generated output on
> stdout?
I don't know why. This is, why you should add debugging output.
Jörg.
end.
--
Das Recht, seine Meinung zu wechseln, ist eines der wichtigsten
menschlichen Previlegien.
(Robert Peel)
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-17 21:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-09-17 17:36 [SOLVED] RE: Weird environment for usb-storage script? Michael Hale
2003-09-17 18:19 ` Michael Hale
2003-09-17 20:25 ` Joerg Sommer
2003-09-17 21:11 ` Michael Hale
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).