From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 19:53:23 +0000 Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: User-space System Device Enumeration (uSDE) Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 11:40:55AM -0800, John Cherry wrote: > As Lars stated in an earlier email, "Competition is good, but only if > they explore distinct approaches". It is a shame that much effort has > been duplicated here on similar approaches. I'm not fully aware of the > history behind the divergence, but it makes sense to enumerate NOW what > is lacking in udev from a uSDE perspective. I'm not aware of why there was a divergence in the first place either :) As udev has been public for a long time now, would someone from Monta Vista care to detail why they found udev lacking and deserving of a duplicate effort? > One objective of the carrier grade initiative is to prevent duplicate > effort. Now that we have two implementations, let's get the > issues/differences on the table and cooperatively move to convergence. I'm trying :) greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel