From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Larson Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 00:29:39 +0000 Subject: Re: Build failure - missing linux/limits.h include? Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org * Arnd Bergmann (arnd@arndb.de) wrote: > On Tuesday 25 November 2003 00:12, Chris Larson wrote: > > udev fails to compile here unless I'm doing a KLIBC build. =A0The reason > > appears to be that the normal limits.h in the gcc inc dir doesn't pull > > in linux/limits.h, whereas the limits.h out in the klibc include dirs > > does. =A0I'd think it'd be best to add a #include to > > udev.h directly, since it uses PATH_MAX. >=20 > No, don't include kernel headers directly if you can avoid it. > The problem you are referring to seems to be with old tool chains, > I have the same symptom with my s390 gcc-2.95/glibc-2.1.3. > Including instead of seems to fix it. Ah, that's better. Thanks :) -- Chris Larson - kergoth at handhelds dot org Embedded Linux Developer - clarson at ti dot com OpenZaurus Project Maintainer - http://openzaurus.org/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel