From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: udev does not create scsi disk entries during bootup
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 23:59:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-hotplug-107033901618195@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-hotplug-106870290127081@msgid-missing>
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 04:54:37PM +0530, Surekha.PC wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> >Can you split this up into 2 different patches, both generated with
> 'diff -u' so we can
> >see the changes easier?
>
> I have generated the patch in the suggested format. The patch for
> appending partition name is just a one liner, so it is part of patch
> enclosed alongwith. Line #34, is the change with this statement.
>
> + strcat(pos, "s");
With that, you break everyone who uses the %n modifier. Why not just
add a 's' to your NAME value?
Not applied.
> >> 1)To include new field in the NUMBER rule specially for iSCSI
> devices.
> >>
> >> The current rule provided by udev is as below.
> >>
> >> NUMBER, BUS="scsi", ID=2:0:0:0", NAME="disk%n"
> >>
> >> For iSCSI devices, since hostid is not consistent, we are defining a
> >> new iSCSI device attribute in sysfs, which will be checked while
> >> naming the device.
> >>
> >> NUMBER, BUS="scsi", ID="0:0:0", device_type="ISCSI", NAME="ib0t0l0%n"
>
> >Where does the device_type come from? Is it a sysfs file?
>
> It is a sysfs file which is a device attribute defined for iSCSI devices
> in the iSCSI driver.
>
> >> 2) Device partition name needs to be appended with "s" before
> >> partition id.
> >>
> >> If the device name consists of bus,target info like "c0b0t0l0" it
> will
> >> be easier to identify the partition as in "c0b0t0l0s1".
>
> >It looks like your patch just always adds a 's' whenever you use a %n
> field. Why not
> >just put the 's' in your NAME? Otherwise you just broke everyone's
> rules who do not want >a 's' :)
>
> The string 's' (it could be named as 'part' also) has be used only on
> partition names like 'sda1', 'sda2' and not on block device name 'sda'.
> So it can't be put in the NAME field.
>
> Below is the how the output for iSCSI device looks with this patch.
>
> This will help separately identify the partition number from lun number.
>
> #ls -l /udev
> total 0
> brw-rw-rw- 1 root root 8, 32 Nov 27 07:17 ib0t4l0
> brw-rw-rw- 1 root root 8, 33 Nov 27 07:17 ib0t4l0s1
> brw-rw-rw- 1 root root 8, 34 Nov 27 07:17 ib0t4l0s2
What is driving naming iscsi devices like this? Any LSB standard? Any
devfs standard?
I really think you can handle all of this for iscsi devices with a
CALLOUT script that can handle this more complex way of creating a name.
> >Can't you do everything you need with a simple callout script right now
> with no changes
> >needed for udev?
>
> Persistent naming of iSCSI devices require bus, target and lun info.
> This is in conjunction with persistent target binding done internally in
> our driver where we bind each iSCSI device to a unique bus/target pair
> based on the iSCSI targetname.
Why? What if I want to name my iscsi device "greg_server_storage"?
What is forcing users to use bus, target, and lun info?
> In a case where there are many targets connected to iSCSI host,
> udev.config is automatically generated by looking up the bus and target
> id allocated for the iSCSI device.
What tool modifies udev.config automatically today?
> This needs to be matched with iSCSI specific device attribute
> 'device_type' to make sure this naming applies only for a iSCSI device.
> It is not possible to achieve this funtionality with CALLOUT
> configuration.
Again, why? What about:
CALLOUT, BUS="scsi", PROGRAM="/sbin/name_iscsi", ID="*", NAME="%c"
and then your program can test the 'type' value of the sysfs device
passed to it. As most scsi device naming issues are going to be handled
by a CALLOUT rule anyway (due to a lot of the scsi device info not
available in sysfs), I don't see a big problem with this.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-01 23:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-13 5:28 udev does not create scsi disk entries during bootup Surekha.PC
2003-11-13 6:25 ` Greg KH
2003-11-13 8:13 ` Surekha.PC
2003-11-14 1:07 ` Greg KH
2003-11-14 3:55 ` Surekha.PC
2003-11-17 4:54 ` Surekha.PC
2003-11-17 13:02 ` Martin Hicks
2003-11-18 8:23 ` Surekha.PC
2003-11-19 13:48 ` Surekha.PC
2003-11-19 23:57 ` Greg KH
2003-11-20 15:11 ` Surekha.PC
2003-11-20 16:46 ` Greg KH
2003-11-20 16:53 ` Greg KH
2003-11-20 18:38 ` Clay Haapala
2003-11-20 18:41 ` Greg KH
2003-11-20 19:11 ` Clay Haapala
2003-11-21 5:49 ` Surekha.PC
2003-11-21 6:12 ` Greg KH
2003-11-21 6:52 ` Surekha.PC
2003-11-22 18:12 ` Greg KH
2003-11-24 12:50 ` Surekha.PC
2003-11-24 22:14 ` Greg KH
2003-11-25 12:56 ` Surekha.PC
2003-11-25 13:12 ` Martin Hicks
2003-11-25 13:40 ` Surekha.PC
2003-11-25 16:36 ` Greg KH
2003-11-27 11:36 ` Surekha.PC
2003-12-01 23:59 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-hotplug-107033901618195@msgid-missing \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).