> On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 09:39:08PM +0100, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 10:33:08PM +0100, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
> > > > what are the advantages/ disadvantages
> > > > to compile using klibc ?
> > > 
> > > A very tiny static executable is created using klibc.  That's
> necessary
> > > for early boot, and people who care about the size of things.
> > > 
> > 
> > thanks for the explanation :-)
> > 
> > could you drop the link to linux source (IIRC ../../gregkh-2.5 ) 
> > in udev/klibc, and replace it with 
> > make KERNEL_DIR=......  USE_KLIBC=true
> 
> Hm, the udev/linux symlink points to:
> 	linux -> ../../../linux/linux-2.5
> 
> If you want to build with klibc, adjust it to where your 2.6 kernel tree
> is located at.
> 
> > i've a small patch but it's only for udev,
> > and it doesn't work with " make USE_KLIBC=true EXTRAS=..."
> > it's mostly 
> > s:$(LINUX_INCLUDE_DIR)/kernel/include:$(KERNEL_DIR)/include:
> > in udev/Makefile & udev/klibc/MCONFIG
> 
> Care to send it?

thanks :-)

and attached
 together with the sed rule correction

svetljo

-- 
+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
Neu: Preissenkung für MMS und FreeMMS! http://www.gmx.net