linux-hotplug.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miles Lane <miles@megapathdsl.net>
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: modutils 2.4.2, please test asap
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 20:05:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-hotplug-98019805709369@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-hotplug-98018911111962@msgid-missing>

Keith Owens wrote:

<snip>
>   "The fact that such modutils binaries won't work with pre-2.4.0
>   kernels is not even on my radar screen, quite frankly.  There isn't
>   even an installed base of people using it, and I don't think anybody
>   of the developers using it are still using pre-kernels. In short, I
>   see absolutely no reason for even trying to maintain any backwards
>   compatibility in this area.".
> 
> Because the USB maintainers did not want to support backwards
> compatibility, Linus saw no need for the patch.  Which is fine, if you
> are happy to break backwards compatibility.  It should be obvious that
> I disagree strongly with this attitude.

Thanks for clarifying that.  I hadn't quite connected all the dots.

I see why you are concerned.

Isn't it true that the /sbin/hotplug support code simply doesn't
exist in older kernels?  I am not sure that making /sbin/hotplug
work on older kernels is possible, no matter how much USB developers
might want to make it work.  If it is true that backporting
/sbin/hotplug support can't be done, than the current usbd/policy
approach is filling an important need.  Another point to consider
is that if we decided to somehow backport /sbin/hotplug support,
we'd need to migrate the installed based from the policy script
approach.  That doesn't seem like totally awesome user support
to me.

Anyhow, enough said.  I'll test your patch.

Sorry this hasn't worked out as you would have liked.

	Miles


_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list  http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-01-22 20:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-01-22 18:24 modutils 2.4.2, please test asap Keith Owens
2001-01-22 19:28 ` Keith Owens
2001-01-22 19:37 ` Miles Lane
2001-01-22 19:58 ` Stephen J. Gowdy
2001-01-22 20:05 ` Miles Lane [this message]
2001-01-22 20:16 ` Johannes Erdfelt
2001-01-22 20:30 ` David Brownell
2001-01-22 21:40 ` Keith Owens
2001-01-22 22:29 ` Johannes Erdfelt
2001-01-22 22:51 ` Keith Owens
2001-01-22 23:09 ` Greg KH
2001-01-22 23:21 ` David Brownell
2001-01-22 23:38 ` Miles Lane
2001-01-22 23:42 ` Keith Owens
2001-01-23  2:52 ` David Brownell
2001-01-23  3:25 ` Keith Owens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-hotplug-98019805709369@msgid-missing \
    --to=miles@megapathdsl.net \
    --cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).