From: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Adding PCMCIA support to the kernel tree -- developers needed.
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 15:45:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-hotplug-98173379619751@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-hotplug-98118528107653@msgid-missing>
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 02:09:39PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > You can retry, you are right. I failed to see that.
> > > But you seem to suffer from the name reuse race.
> > >
> > > reality task A task B
> > > plug in dev A
> > > bind dev A to name 0
> > > unplug dev A
> > > unbind name 0
> > > plug in dev B
> > > bind dev B to name 0
> > > do something arbitrary
> > > to the dev associated
> > > with name 0
> > >
> > > If the kernel would select name 0, it could lock on name 0.
> > > With your scheme this is hard to do.
> >
> > Unbind on name 0 should block until task A finishes the arbitrary stuff.
> > Is there any problem with that? We could even have a 'setup finished'
> > ioctl for this, though I think I'd prefer just having one task per action.
>
> This would work provided that the lock is taken atomically with binding to
> the name.
Yep, that's what I intended.
> > > Nor do you absolutely need to.
> > > You can already rename network devices by ioctl.
> > > For everything else a humble symlink should do the job, shouldn't it ?
> >
> > Yes, but with humble symlinks you will run out of minor/major numbers soon.
>
> Why is that ? Even if you assign numbers by the agent you would take them out
> of a pool of numbers the kernel could also use.
> In both cases it would seem that devices use the same amount of numbers.
Actually, you're right. For some reason I was assuming the symlinks
would have to point to stable names - unique at least for each topology path.
This is not completely necessary, though.
> > > Else you introduce complexity without much gain.
> > > And you need renaming in any case, as device names may have been assigned
> > > during boot.
> >
> > Yes. Symlinks would help here, however, you'd probably need devfs in
> > that case.
>
> I can see devfs helping tremendously with providing stable names, but why is
> it necessary ?
It isn't needed - I was assuming the symlinks would have to point to
stable names.
--
Vojtech Pavlik
SuSE Labs
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-09 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 107+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-03 7:28 Adding PCMCIA support to the kernel tree -- developers needed Miles Lane
2001-02-03 10:07 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-02-03 19:27 ` David Woodhouse
2001-02-03 23:59 ` Miles Lane
2001-02-04 0:00 ` David Hinds
2001-02-04 0:05 ` David Woodhouse
2001-02-04 1:19 ` David Brownell
2001-02-04 1:58 ` Miles Lane
2001-02-04 3:26 ` Keith Owens
2001-02-04 5:59 ` Miles Lane
2001-02-04 8:56 ` David Hinds
2001-02-04 9:55 ` David Woodhouse
2001-02-04 10:00 ` David Woodhouse
2001-02-04 10:10 ` Oliver Neukum
2001-02-04 10:53 ` David Woodhouse
2001-02-04 11:37 ` David Woodhouse
2001-02-04 17:34 ` David Hinds
2001-02-04 18:02 ` Miles Lane
2001-02-04 18:16 ` Oliver Neukum
2001-02-04 18:54 ` Miles Lane
2001-02-05 1:14 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-02-05 1:56 ` David Brownell
2001-02-05 2:43 ` Miles Lane
2001-02-05 8:42 ` Miles Lane
2001-02-05 10:01 ` Keith Owens
2001-02-05 10:13 ` Keith Owens
2001-02-05 23:43 ` David Woodhouse
2001-02-05 23:45 ` David Woodhouse
2001-02-05 23:59 ` Oliver Neukum
2001-02-06 0:27 ` Miles Lane
2001-02-06 1:10 ` David Brownell
2001-02-06 1:40 ` David Brownell
2001-02-06 6:55 ` Miles Lane
2001-02-06 7:11 ` David Woodhouse
2001-02-06 7:58 ` David Hinds
2001-02-06 8:02 ` David Hinds
2001-02-06 8:13 ` David Hinds
2001-02-06 9:51 ` Oliver Neukum
2001-02-06 13:46 ` Andrew Morton
2001-02-06 15:15 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-02-06 15:20 ` David Woodhouse
2001-02-06 15:33 ` Oliver Neukum
2001-02-06 15:35 ` David Woodhouse
2001-02-06 15:54 ` Oliver Neukum
2001-02-06 16:43 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-02-06 18:56 ` David Brownell
2001-02-06 19:22 ` David Brownell
2001-02-06 19:31 ` David Brownell
2001-02-06 22:09 ` Adam J. Richter
2001-02-06 22:10 ` Andrew Morton
2001-02-06 22:50 ` Oliver Neukum
2001-02-06 23:07 ` Andrew Morton
2001-02-06 23:12 ` Andrew Morton
2001-02-06 23:14 ` Andrew Morton
2001-02-06 23:20 ` David Woodhouse
2001-02-06 23:30 ` Oliver Neukum
2001-02-06 23:34 ` Oliver Neukum
2001-02-06 23:36 ` Andrew Morton
2001-02-07 1:33 ` David Brownell
2001-02-07 2:11 ` Miles Lane
2001-02-07 2:38 ` Adam J. Richter
2001-02-07 9:02 ` Oliver Neukum
2001-02-07 9:09 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-02-07 9:10 ` David Woodhouse
2001-02-07 9:35 ` Oliver Neukum
2001-02-07 9:37 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-02-07 9:57 ` Oliver Neukum
2001-02-07 10:11 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-02-07 10:27 ` David Woodhouse
2001-02-07 10:29 ` Oliver Neukum
2001-02-07 10:30 ` David Woodhouse
2001-02-07 14:45 ` Oliver Neukum
2001-02-07 15:19 ` Adam J. Richter
2001-02-07 16:11 ` Oliver Neukum
2001-02-07 17:37 ` Miles Lane
2001-02-07 17:48 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-02-07 18:24 ` David Brownell
2001-02-07 18:42 ` David Brownell
2001-02-07 18:47 ` David Brownell
2001-02-07 18:47 ` Oliver Neukum
2001-02-07 19:00 ` David Brownell
2001-02-07 19:29 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-02-07 19:59 ` Miles Lane
2001-02-07 21:02 ` Oliver Neukum
2001-02-07 21:14 ` David Brownell
2001-02-07 22:43 ` Oliver Neukum
2001-02-08 7:22 ` Miles Lane
2001-02-08 9:29 ` Adam J. Richter
2001-02-08 10:24 ` Oliver Neukum
2001-02-08 12:47 ` Andrew Morton
2001-02-08 13:22 ` Oliver Neukum
2001-02-08 13:49 ` Andrew Morton
2001-02-08 14:07 ` Oliver Neukum
2001-02-08 15:00 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-02-08 15:10 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-02-08 15:13 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-02-09 7:42 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-02-09 11:48 ` Oliver Neukum
2001-02-09 12:45 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-02-09 13:09 ` Oliver Neukum
2001-02-09 14:15 ` David Brownell
2001-02-09 15:45 ` Vojtech Pavlik [this message]
2001-02-26 17:47 ` David Brownell
2001-02-26 21:45 ` Chris Brand
2001-02-27 7:56 ` David Hinds
2001-02-28 16:56 ` David Brownell
2001-02-28 17:32 ` David Hinds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-hotplug-98173379619751@msgid-missing \
--to=vojtech@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).