From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: OT(?) -- Should the net.agent script cause "ifup lo" to be run?
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 22:08:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-hotplug-98322600306094@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-hotplug-98309074821805@msgid-missing>
> It would be nice to be able to determine whether an interface
> is created because someone manually loaded the module or whether
> kmod loaded it, but I'm not sure how that would be instrumented.
One thing I'm saying is that such things shouldn't matter.
Intent shouldn't be asked; reliable program systems
rarely have "if (CameFrom (...)) ..." logic.
What should get tested is something explicit, such as
the interface state: is it already "up", is there a carrier,
does it even need a carrier, and so on. I don't know
that all the right information is available ... unless you
apply heuristics based on device names. (Such
heuristics seem to be the only solution for now.)
> > In the 2.5
> > kernels it might be good to make all network interfaces
> > fit into a common initialization model.
>
> I think you're fundamentally misunderstanding how PPP works; for
I think you're misunderstanding what I'm saying. But since
network interface operation can't change for 2.4, and I
think that's what you're focussed on, I won't try to clarify.
- Dave
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-26 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-25 8:47 OT(?) -- Should the net.agent script cause "ifup lo" to be run? Miles Lane
2001-02-25 10:03 ` Adam J. Richter
2001-02-25 21:37 ` Bill Nottingham
2001-02-25 23:45 ` David Brownell
2001-02-26 0:38 ` Bill Nottingham
2001-02-26 3:40 ` David Brownell
2001-02-26 4:12 ` Bill Nottingham
2001-02-26 4:14 ` Bill Nottingham
2001-02-26 6:59 ` Miles Lane
2001-02-26 7:17 ` Miles Lane
2001-02-26 16:50 ` David Brownell
2001-02-26 17:31 ` David Brownell
2001-02-26 19:52 ` Bill Nottingham
2001-02-26 22:08 ` David Brownell [this message]
2001-02-26 22:14 ` David Brownell
2001-02-26 22:17 ` David Brownell
2001-02-26 22:24 ` Bill Nottingham
2001-02-26 22:30 ` Bill Nottingham
2001-02-26 22:48 ` David Brownell
2001-02-27 6:23 ` Miles Lane
2001-02-27 6:46 ` Miles Lane
2001-02-27 7:17 ` Miles Lane
2001-02-27 7:23 ` Miles Lane
2001-02-27 7:54 ` David Hinds
2001-02-28 5:14 ` Miles Lane
2001-02-28 16:50 ` David Brownell
2001-02-28 17:24 ` David Hinds
2001-03-01 4:37 ` David Brownell
2001-03-01 5:27 ` Bill Nottingham
2001-03-01 5:34 ` Bill Nottingham
2001-03-01 5:45 ` David Hinds
2001-03-01 17:27 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-hotplug-98322600306094@msgid-missing \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).