From: Tim Jansen <tim@tjansen.de>
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/Patch] Device Registry
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2001 23:07:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-hotplug-98616728118704@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-hotplug-98614762103643@msgid-missing>
On Sunday 01 April 2001 19:47, you wrote:
> I like the notion of modeling through attributes, but the flat
> namespace bothers me a lot. Except maybe as a way to
> finesse the namespace structure arguments! I'd rather see
> separate naming contexts (directories) grouping different
> types of devices.
I am very interested in ideas how to do this better (especially to have one
file per device), but there were three reasons for the current implementation:
- it is easier to implement in kernel and user-space
- i dont know how to name the devices. I looked at the way sun did it with
their device tree and didnt like it, even though I like the
everything-is-a-file notion, too
- as you said, it is important to be able to find all devices in the system.
Actually this was my orginal intent, I wanted to get all possible information
about all devices and display them to the user.
> - The "Device IDs", if they're unique enough,
> remove need for a "common/number" attribute.
Agreed.
> - Physical topology is a much better way to derive
> the device ids ... in fact, likely the only way that
> can work in general. Vendor/product IDs don't
> belong there, or even device type/class codes.
The reason for vendor/product ID and serial number is that you should not be
forced to reconfigure your system when you plug your device in another slot
or hub. I think this is a desirable goal.
> - For PCI, "device" isn't the right focus, it's the
> "function" -- devices can have many functions,
> not necessarily related. /proc/bus/pci/* has
> per-function files.
Yes, this is why there are sub-devices. Each function should be displayed as
a sub-device. I just haven't implemented this yet.
BTW: don't try the patch version 0.0.1 unless have CONFIG_SMP turned off and
compile USB support into the kernel, otherwise it will not work. I hope to
make the next release tomorrow...
bye...
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-01 23:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-01 17:47 [RFC/Patch] Device Registry David Brownell
2001-04-01 23:07 ` Tim Jansen [this message]
2001-04-07 10:56 ` Tim Jansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-hotplug-98616728118704@msgid-missing \
--to=tim@tjansen.de \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).