Re: Next problem, rpm organization

[Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>]

On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 09:32:19AM -0700, Stephen Williams wrote:
> 
> greg@kroah.com said:
> > But the fxload isn't dependent on the hotplug-core, now is it? 
> 
> Correct, and it will install even if hotplug-core isn't installed.
> There is precedent for this relationship, for example the nfs-server
> and nfs-clients packages, which are mutually independent, though from
> the same source tree.

True, ok, I'm convinced :)


> So I should create admin/fxload, and admin/Makefile, and encourage new
> programs be added in directories under admin/<foo> and into the
> admin/Makefile makefile. I can modify the spec file and install targets
> apropriately.
> 
> I can do that, if you would like. My initial proposal was designed to
> minimize the impact.

I like this, and don't mind moving things around a bit if it makes
sense.  If David agrees I say do it.

thanks,

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list  http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel