From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 16:37:55 +0000 Subject: Re: Next problem, rpm organization Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 09:32:19AM -0700, Stephen Williams wrote: > > greg@kroah.com said: > > But the fxload isn't dependent on the hotplug-core, now is it? > > Correct, and it will install even if hotplug-core isn't installed. > There is precedent for this relationship, for example the nfs-server > and nfs-clients packages, which are mutually independent, though from > the same source tree. True, ok, I'm convinced :) > So I should create admin/fxload, and admin/Makefile, and encourage new > programs be added in directories under admin/ and into the > admin/Makefile makefile. I can modify the spec file and install targets > apropriately. > > I can do that, if you would like. My initial proposal was designed to > minimize the impact. I like this, and don't mind moving things around a bit if it makes sense. If David agrees I say do it. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel