From: "thilo.cestonaro@ts.fujitsu.com" <thilo.cestonaro@ts.fujitsu.com>
To: "linux@roeck-us.net" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
"linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] added kernel module for FTS sensor chip "Teutates"
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 07:39:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1465284992.18490.4.camel@ts.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57563D00.3030005@roeck-us.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1885 bytes --]
On Mo, 2016-06-06 at 20:18 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 06/06/2016 02:21 AM, thilo.cestonaro@ts.fujitsu.com wrote:
> >
> > Hey Guenter!
> >
> > Thanks for your patience and very detailed review!
> > I will change the code to address all you hints where no discussion is needed.
> > The others follow down here.
> >
> > On Fr, 2016-06-03 at 22:51 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > +#define FTSTEUTATES_WATCHDOG_RESOLUTION 60
> > > > +
> > > 60 seconds (minimum) resolution ? Really ? This is very unusual.
> > Will double check and talk to the hw guy.
There is a register which sets the resolution to 1sec. but it wasn't documented :(.
So next "version" will have 1sec. resolution.
> > > > +static ssize_t show_fan_fault(struct device *dev,
> > > > + struct device_attribute *devattr, char *buf)
> > > > +{
> > > > + int index = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr)->index;
> > > > + struct ftsteutates_data *data = ftsteutates_update_device(dev);
> > > > +
> > > > + return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", data->fan_present[index] == 1 ? 0 : 1);
> > > A non-present fan does not indicate a fan fault.
> > For me a fan fault was a not existing fan, as the alarm is handled via fan_alarm.
> > What is the understanding of fan_fault and fan_alarm?
> >
> Some fan controllers can detect if a fan is faulty, for example if it consumes
> power but does not turn. Unless you know for sure that a fan is faulty, don't
> report that it is. A non-existing fan is definitely not faulty.
About the presence register from Teutates Spec:
The present-detection is done by checking the Fan-Speed.
If the fan-speed is 0 or below fan-fault-speed all the time,
the fan will be handled as not present. If the fan-speed is
greater than fan-fault-speed, the fan is handled as present.
So the presence is the faulty fan detection?
Cheers,
Thilo
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3847 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-07 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-31 8:55 [PATCH] added kernel module for FTS sensor chip "Teutates" Thilo Cestonaro
2016-06-04 5:51 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-06-06 9:21 ` thilo.cestonaro
2016-06-07 3:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-06-07 7:39 ` thilo.cestonaro [this message]
2016-06-07 13:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-06-09 9:13 ` thilo.cestonaro
2016-06-09 13:25 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1465284992.18490.4.camel@ts.fujitsu.com \
--to=thilo.cestonaro@ts.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox