From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Message-ID: <1485154594.12563.27.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] hwmon: (lm70) Utilize dev_warn instead of pr_warn From: Joe Perches To: Florian Fainelli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall Cc: Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck , Jonathan Corbet , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , "open list:HARDWARE MONITORING" , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 22:56:34 -0800 In-Reply-To: <1485153837.12563.23.camel@perches.com> References: <20170121192010.30681-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com> <20170121192010.30681-2-f.fainelli@gmail.com> <1485153837.12563.23.camel@perches.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: On Sun, 2017-01-22 at 22:43 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > Two questions for Julia Lawall: > > o is there a better way to do this than repeat the blocks > one for each replacement > o can struct device * dev be made an arbitrary identifier > > $ cat dev_printk.cocci > @@ > identifier fn; > type T; > @@ > > T fn ( ..., struct device * dev, ... ) { > <... > - pr_emerg( > + dev_emerg(dev, > ...); > ...> > } Well, the second question is simple if I would just think a little before asking... @@ identifier fn; identifier dev; type T; @@ T fn ( ..., struct device * dev, ... ) { <... - pr_emerg( + dev_emerg(dev, ...); ...> } etc...