From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>, Kamil Debski <kamil@wypas.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: pwm-fan: switch to new atomic PWM API
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 16:25:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1767160.ko02kahecW@amdc3058> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6c741041-faf4-6951-5f2d-9f7b9c54c9ca@roeck-us.net>
Hi,
On Monday, April 24, 2017 06:26:12 AM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 04/24/2017 06:13 AM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > Switch pwm-fan driver to new atomic PWM API.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
> > ---
> > Depends on "[PATCH v2 0/3] pwm: pwm-samsung: fix suspend/resume support"
> > patchset (https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2495209.html).
> >
>
> Why would this driver, which does not depend on any Samsung code,
> depend on a Samsung specific fix ?
The above patchset contains pwm-fan specific patch:
"[PATCH v2 3/3] hwmon: pwm-fan: remove no longer needed suspend/resume code"
(https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2495210.html).
It seems that the patchset name itself could be better,
sorry for this.
> Was this tested with hardware ?
Yes, on Exynos5422 based Odroid-XU3 board.
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-24 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20170424131342epcas5p4cb2f53f6c780119557ff3da56fb8f0a8@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2017-04-24 13:13 ` [PATCH] hwmon: pwm-fan: switch to new atomic PWM API Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2017-04-24 13:13 ` [PATCH] pwm: pwm-samsung: " Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2017-08-21 8:29 ` Thierry Reding
2017-04-24 13:26 ` [PATCH] hwmon: pwm-fan: " Guenter Roeck
2017-04-24 14:25 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2017-06-02 13:23 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-06-07 13:38 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2017-06-07 21:07 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1767160.ko02kahecW@amdc3058 \
--to=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=kamil@wypas.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox