From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>,
linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Sherry Hurwitz <sherry.hurwitz@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/6] hwmon: (fam15h_power) Add compute unit accumulated power
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 08:30:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160406153025.GA16343@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459928655-6071-3-git-send-email-ray.huang@amd.com>
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 03:44:11PM +0800, Huang Rui wrote:
> This patch adds a member in fam15h_power_data which specifies the
> compute unit accumulated power. It adds do_read_registers_on_cu to do
> all the read to all MSRs and run it on one of the online cores on each
> compute unit with smp_call_function_many(). This behavior can decrease
> IPI numbers.
>
> Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c b/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c
> index 4f695d8..4edbaf0 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/pci.h>
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
> +#include <linux/cpu.h>
> +#include <linux/cpumask.h>
> #include <asm/processor.h>
> #include <asm/msr.h>
>
> @@ -44,7 +46,9 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>
> #define FAM15H_MIN_NUM_ATTRS 2
> #define FAM15H_NUM_GROUPS 2
> +#define MAX_CUS 8
>
> +#define MSR_F15H_CU_PWR_ACCUMULATOR 0xc001007a
> #define MSR_F15H_CU_MAX_PWR_ACCUMULATOR 0xc001007b
>
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_M70H_NB_F4 0x15b4
> @@ -59,6 +63,8 @@ struct fam15h_power_data {
> struct attribute_group group;
> /* maximum accumulated power of a compute unit */
> u64 max_cu_acc_power;
> + /* accumulated power of the compute units */
> + u64 cu_acc_power[MAX_CUS];
> };
>
> static ssize_t show_power(struct device *dev,
> @@ -125,6 +131,70 @@ static ssize_t show_power_crit(struct device *dev,
> }
> static DEVICE_ATTR(power1_crit, S_IRUGO, show_power_crit, NULL);
>
> +static void do_read_registers_on_cu(void *_data)
> +{
> + struct fam15h_power_data *data = _data;
> + int cpu, cu;
> +
> + cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +
Is this function now defined in non-SMP code ? If so, can you point me to the
patch or branch introducing it ? It doesn't seem to be in mainline or in -next
unless I am missing it.
> + /*
> + * With the new x86 topology modelling, cpu core id actually
> + * is compute unit id.
> + */
> + cu = cpu_data(cpu).cpu_core_id;
> +
> + rdmsrl_safe(MSR_F15H_CU_PWR_ACCUMULATOR, &data->cu_acc_power[cu]);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * This function is only able to be called when CPUID
> + * Fn8000_0007:EDX[12] is set.
> + */
> +static int read_registers(struct fam15h_power_data *data)
> +{
> + int this_cpu, ret, cpu;
> + int core, this_core;
> + cpumask_var_t mask;
> +
> + ret = zalloc_cpumask_var(&mask, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ret)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + get_online_cpus();
> + this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +
> + /*
> + * Choose the first online core of each compute unit, and then
> + * read their MSR value of power and ptsc in a single IPI,
> + * because the MSR value of CPU core represent the compute
> + * unit's.
> + */
> + core = -1;
> +
> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> + this_core = topology_core_id(cpu);
> +
> + if (this_core == core)
> + continue;
> +
> + core = this_core;
> +
Sorry if I missed some context - is it guaranteed that all cores in the same
compute unit are returned next to each other from for_each_online_cpu() ?
Thanks,
Guenter
> + /* get any CPU on this compute unit */
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpumask_any(topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu)), mask);
> + }
> +
> + if (cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, mask))
> + do_read_registers_on_cu(data);
> +
> + smp_call_function_many(mask, do_read_registers_on_cu, data, true);
> + put_online_cpus();
> +
> + free_cpumask_var(mask);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int fam15h_power_init_attrs(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> struct fam15h_power_data *data)
> {
> @@ -263,7 +333,7 @@ static int fam15h_power_init_data(struct pci_dev *f4,
>
> data->max_cu_acc_power = tmp;
>
> - return 0;
> + return read_registers(data);
> }
>
> static int fam15h_power_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> --
> 1.9.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-06 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-06 7:44 [PATCH v6 0/6] hwmon: (fam15h_power) Introduce an accumulated power reporting algorithm Huang Rui
2016-04-06 7:44 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] hwmon: (fam15h_power) Add CPU_SUP_AMD as the dependence Huang Rui
2016-04-19 13:35 ` [v6,1/6] " Guenter Roeck
2016-04-06 7:44 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] hwmon: (fam15h_power) Add compute unit accumulated power Huang Rui
2016-04-06 15:30 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2016-04-07 5:05 ` Huang Rui
2016-04-07 5:25 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-04-06 7:44 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] hwmon: (fam15h_power) Add ptsc counter value for " Huang Rui
2016-04-06 7:44 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] hwmon: (fam15h_power) Introduce a cpu accumulated power reporting algorithm Huang Rui
2016-04-06 7:44 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] hwmon: (fam15h_power) Add documentation for TDP and accumulated power algorithm Huang Rui
2016-04-06 7:44 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] hwmon: (fam15h_power) Add platform check function Huang Rui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160406153025.GA16343@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
--cc=sherry.hurwitz@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox