From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
To: Matt Ranostay <mranostay@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
David Frey <david.frey@sensirion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: sht3x: set initial jiffies to last_update
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:10:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160721081046.0f658c18@endymion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKzfze82xFRU6A09rXS3OhtLU99cZt_2waRcFGvTgWbx9huZLA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Matt,
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 17:22:10 -0700, Matt Ranostay wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> wrote:
> > On jeu., 2016-07-07 at 19:46 -0700, Matt Ranostay wrote:
> >> Handling the wraparound requires the data->last_update to be set to an
> >> initial jiffies value. Otherwise you can start in a state where the
> >> sensor will never request a reading.
> >
> > I can't see how. As I read the code, in the worst case, readings can be
> > blocked for interval_ms (2 seconds maximum.)
>
> On 64-bit systems this is never an issue because the jiffies counter
> will never wrap around.
>
> But my system is a 32-bit ARM core, so the the kernel sets the initial
> value to 0xfffb6c20 so it will wrap around in 5 minutes to find buggy
> code.
>
> So looking at time_after(0xfffb6c20, 0) will return false always till
> it finally rolls over.
I've always been confused by how jiffies wrapping is handled. So I
tested it, and you are correct.
> >> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> >> Cc: David Frey <david.frey@sensirion.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Matt Ranostay <mranostay@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/hwmon/sht3x.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/sht3x.c b/drivers/hwmon/sht3x.c
> >> index 450645b6053d..05a925257938 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/hwmon/sht3x.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/sht3x.c
> >> @@ -722,7 +722,7 @@ static int sht3x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> >> data->setup.blocking_io = false;
> >> data->setup.high_precision = true;
> >> data->mode = 0;
> >> - data->last_update = 0;
> >> + data->last_update = jiffies;
> >> data->client = client;
> >> crc8_populate_msb(sht3x_crc8_table, SHT3X_CRC8_POLYNOMIAL);
> >>
> >
> > Both look equally wrong to me. With your proposal, accessing the sysfs
> > attributes right after loading the driver will not trigger a reading.
> >
> > In order to guarantee that the first access will trigger a reading,
> > data->last_update should be initialized to jiffies -
> > msecs_to_jiffies(2000) (the maximum interval value.)
>
> Ok that is fine. Rather do jiffies + (2 * HZ)
2 * HZ is fine. But it's minus, not plus. You want to initialize the
last update time to 2 seconds BEFORE the driver is being loaded, so
that the current time is at least 2 seconds AFTER the (fake) last
update at first access. And you should subtract another jiffy to be on
the safe side.
Can you please send an updated patch?
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-21 6:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-08 2:46 [PATCH] hwmon: sht3x: set initial jiffies to last_update Matt Ranostay
2016-07-08 7:56 ` Jean Delvare
2016-07-09 0:22 ` Matt Ranostay
2016-07-21 6:10 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2016-07-24 23:50 ` Matt Ranostay
2016-07-25 8:42 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160721081046.0f658c18@endymion \
--to=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=david.frey@sensirion.com \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=mranostay@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox