From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: eajames@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, joel@jms.id.au, andrew@aj.id.au,
jk@ozlabs.org, cbostic@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
"Edward A. James" <eajames@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC, 1/3] drivers/hwmon/pmbus: Access word data for STATUS_WORD and use it by default
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 18:51:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170809015115.GA9725@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1502162748-16372-2-git-send-email-eajames@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 10:25:46PM -0500, eajames@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
> From: "Edward A. James" <eajames@us.ibm.com>
>
> Pmbus core always reads byte data from the status register, even if
> configured to use STATUS_WORD. Use a function pointer so we always do
> either byte or word access depending on which register we're trying to
> access. Also switch to use STATUS_WORD by default.
>
> Signed-off-by: Edward A. James <eajames@us.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
> index f1eff6b..8511aba 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
> @@ -113,7 +113,8 @@ struct pmbus_data {
> * so we keep them all together.
> */
> u8 status[PB_NUM_STATUS_REG];
> - u8 status_register;
> +
> + int (*read_status)(struct i2c_client *client, int page);
>
> u8 currpage;
> };
> @@ -324,7 +325,7 @@ static int pmbus_check_status_cml(struct i2c_client *client)
> struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> int status, status2;
>
> - status = _pmbus_read_byte_data(client, -1, data->status_register);
> + status = data->read_status(client, -1);
> if (status < 0 || (status & PB_STATUS_CML)) {
> status2 = _pmbus_read_byte_data(client, -1, PMBUS_STATUS_CML);
> if (status2 < 0 || (status2 & PB_CML_FAULT_INVALID_COMMAND))
> @@ -348,6 +349,36 @@ static bool pmbus_check_register(struct i2c_client *client,
> return rv >= 0;
> }
>
> +/* Check specified page status register accessibility. Need a separate
I am not in favor of networking-style multi-line comments.
> + * function rather than the two above so we can use the correct status
> + * register, and we can optimize out the second status register read.
> + */
> +static bool pmbus_check_status_register(struct i2c_client *client, int page)
> +{
> + int status, rc = 0;
> + struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +
> + status = data->read_status(client, page);
> + if (status < 0)
> + goto out;
> +
> + if (!(data->flags & PMBUS_SKIP_STATUS_CHECK)) {
> + if (status & PB_STATUS_CML) {
> + status = _pmbus_read_byte_data(client, -1,
> + PMBUS_STATUS_CML);
> + if (status < 0 ||
> + (status & PB_CML_FAULT_INVALID_COMMAND))
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + rc = 1;
If you want to use bool, please use bool.
> +
> +out:
> + pmbus_clear_fault_page(client, -1);
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
> bool pmbus_check_byte_register(struct i2c_client *client, int page, int reg)
> {
> return pmbus_check_register(client, _pmbus_read_byte_data, page, reg);
> @@ -393,9 +424,8 @@ static struct pmbus_data *pmbus_update_device(struct device *dev)
> int i, j;
>
> for (i = 0; i < info->pages; i++) {
> - data->status[PB_STATUS_BASE + i]
> - = _pmbus_read_byte_data(client, i,
> - data->status_register);
> + data->status[PB_STATUS_BASE + i] =
> + data->read_status(client, i);
This doesn't really work anymore, since the status register now has to hold 16
bit. Sure, the next patch tries to fix that, but that leaves a 1-patch gap.
Changing the width of data->status to 16 bit results in a "waste" of a whopping
32 * 6 + 2 or around 200 bytes. I don't think that warrants the complexity you
are introducing with the next patch. Are you sure that adds less than 200 bytes
of code ?)
> for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(pmbus_status); j++) {
> struct _pmbus_status *s = &pmbus_status[j];
>
> @@ -1051,8 +1081,7 @@ static int pmbus_add_sensor_attrs_one(struct i2c_client *client,
> * the generic status register for this page is accessible.
> */
> if (!ret && attr->gbit &&
> - pmbus_check_byte_register(client, page,
> - data->status_register)) {
> + pmbus_check_status_register(client, page)) {
> ret = pmbus_add_boolean(data, name, "alarm", index,
> NULL, NULL,
> PB_STATUS_BASE + page,
> @@ -1729,6 +1758,16 @@ static int pmbus_identify_common(struct i2c_client *client,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int pmbus_read_status_word(struct i2c_client *client, int page)
> +{
> + return _pmbus_read_word_data(client, page, PMBUS_STATUS_WORD);
> +}
> +
> +static int pmbus_read_status_byte(struct i2c_client *client, int page)
> +{
> + return _pmbus_read_byte_data(client, page, PMBUS_STATUS_BYTE);
> +}
> +
> static int pmbus_init_common(struct i2c_client *client, struct pmbus_data *data,
> struct pmbus_driver_info *info)
> {
> @@ -1736,16 +1775,16 @@ static int pmbus_init_common(struct i2c_client *client, struct pmbus_data *data,
> int page, ret;
>
> /*
> - * Some PMBus chips don't support PMBUS_STATUS_BYTE, so try
> - * to use PMBUS_STATUS_WORD instead if that is the case.
> + * Some PMBus chips don't support PMBUS_STATUS_WORD, so try
> + * to use PMBUS_STATUS_BYTE instead if that is the case.
> * Bail out if both registers are not supported.
> */
> - data->status_register = PMBUS_STATUS_BYTE;
> - ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, PMBUS_STATUS_BYTE);
> - if (ret < 0 || ret == 0xff) {
> - data->status_register = PMBUS_STATUS_WORD;
> - ret = i2c_smbus_read_word_data(client, PMBUS_STATUS_WORD);
> - if (ret < 0 || ret == 0xffff) {
> + data->read_status = pmbus_read_status_word;
> + ret = i2c_smbus_read_word_data(client, PMBUS_STATUS_WORD);
> + if (ret < 0 || ret == 0xffff) {
> + data->read_status = pmbus_read_status_byte;
> + ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, PMBUS_STATUS_BYTE);
> + if (ret < 0 || ret == 0xff) {
> dev_err(dev, "PMBus status register not found\n");
> return -ENODEV;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-09 1:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-08 3:25 [RFC 0/3] drivers/hwmon/pmbus: Use STATUS_WORD and add status sensors Eddie James
2017-08-08 3:25 ` [RFC 1/3] drivers/hwmon/pmbus: Access word data for STATUS_WORD and use it by default Eddie James
2017-08-09 1:51 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2017-08-08 3:25 ` [RFC 2/3] drivers/hmwon/pmbus: store STATUS_WORD in status registers Eddie James
2017-08-09 1:58 ` [RFC,2/3] " Guenter Roeck
2017-08-08 3:25 ` [RFC 3/3] drivers/hwmon/pmbus: Add sensor status to pmbus attributes Eddie James
2017-08-09 2:00 ` [RFC,3/3] " Guenter Roeck
2017-08-08 4:00 ` [RFC 0/3] drivers/hwmon/pmbus: Use STATUS_WORD and add status sensors Guenter Roeck
2017-08-08 16:12 ` Eddie James
2017-08-08 19:26 ` Christopher Bostic
2017-08-08 20:25 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-08-09 1:51 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170809015115.GA9725@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=andrew@aj.id.au \
--cc=cbostic@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=eajames@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=eajames@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jk@ozlabs.org \
--cc=joel@jms.id.au \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox