* [PATCH v2 2/3] pwm: pwm-samsung: fix suspend/resume support
2017-04-24 10:01 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] pwm: pwm-samsung: fix suspend/resume support Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2017-04-24 10:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] pwm: pwm-samsung: remove redundant checks from pwm_samsung_config() Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
@ 2017-04-24 10:01 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2017-08-21 8:34 ` Thierry Reding
2017-04-24 10:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] hwmon: pwm-fan: remove no longer needed suspend/resume code Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2017-06-29 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] pwm: pwm-samsung: fix suspend/resume support Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
3 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz @ 2017-04-24 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thierry Reding, Jean Delvare, Guenter Roeck, Kamil Debski
Cc: Tomasz Figa, linux-pwm, linux-hwmon, linux-kernel,
linux-samsung-soc, b.zolnierkie
Fix suspend/resume support:
- add disabled_mask to struct samsung_pwm_chip to track PWM
disabled state information in pwm_samsung_{disable,enable}()
- rename pwm_samsung_config() to __pwm_samsung_config() and
add extra force_period parameter to be used during resume
(to force tin_ns and tcnt recalculation)
- add pwm_samsung_config() wrapper for preserving old behavior
- properly restore PWM configuration in pwm_samsung_resume()
- remove no longer needed pwm_samsung_suspend()
- update Copyrights
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
index 9ea7638..062f2cf 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
* Copyright (c) 2008 Simtec Electronics
* Ben Dooks <ben@simtec.co.uk>, <ben-linux@fluff.org>
* Copyright (c) 2013 Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
+ * Copyright (c) 2017 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
*
* PWM driver for Samsung SoCs
*
@@ -74,6 +75,7 @@ struct samsung_pwm_channel {
* @chip: generic PWM chip
* @variant: local copy of hardware variant data
* @inverter_mask: inverter status for all channels - one bit per channel
+ * @disabled_mask: disabled status for all channels - one bit per channel
* @base: base address of mapped PWM registers
* @base_clk: base clock used to drive the timers
* @tclk0: external clock 0 (can be ERR_PTR if not present)
@@ -83,6 +85,7 @@ struct samsung_pwm_chip {
struct pwm_chip chip;
struct samsung_pwm_variant variant;
u8 inverter_mask;
+ u8 disabled_mask;
void __iomem *base;
struct clk *base_clk;
@@ -257,6 +260,8 @@ static int pwm_samsung_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
tcon |= TCON_START(tcon_chan) | TCON_AUTORELOAD(tcon_chan);
writel(tcon, our_chip->base + REG_TCON);
+ our_chip->disabled_mask &= ~BIT(pwm->hwpwm);
+
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&samsung_pwm_lock, flags);
return 0;
@@ -275,6 +280,8 @@ static void pwm_samsung_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
tcon &= ~TCON_AUTORELOAD(tcon_chan);
writel(tcon, our_chip->base + REG_TCON);
+ our_chip->disabled_mask |= BIT(pwm->hwpwm);
+
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&samsung_pwm_lock, flags);
}
@@ -297,8 +304,8 @@ static void pwm_samsung_manual_update(struct samsung_pwm_chip *chip,
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&samsung_pwm_lock, flags);
}
-static int pwm_samsung_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
- int duty_ns, int period_ns)
+static int __pwm_samsung_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+ int duty_ns, int period_ns, bool force_period)
{
struct samsung_pwm_chip *our_chip = to_samsung_pwm_chip(chip);
struct samsung_pwm_channel *chan = pwm_get_chip_data(pwm);
@@ -319,7 +326,7 @@ static int pwm_samsung_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
++tcnt;
/* Check to see if we are changing the clock rate of the PWM. */
- if (chan->period_ns != period_ns) {
+ if (chan->period_ns != period_ns || force_period) {
unsigned long tin_rate;
u32 period;
@@ -378,6 +385,12 @@ static int pwm_samsung_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
return 0;
}
+static int pwm_samsung_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+ int duty_ns, int period_ns)
+{
+ return __pwm_samsung_config(chip, pwm, duty_ns, period_ns, false);
+}
+
static void pwm_samsung_set_invert(struct samsung_pwm_chip *chip,
unsigned int channel, bool invert)
{
@@ -589,51 +602,41 @@ static int pwm_samsung_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
-static int pwm_samsung_suspend(struct device *dev)
+static int pwm_samsung_resume(struct device *dev)
{
- struct samsung_pwm_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ struct samsung_pwm_chip *our_chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ struct pwm_chip *chip = &our_chip->chip;
unsigned int i;
- /*
- * No one preserves these values during suspend so reset them.
- * Otherwise driver leaves PWM unconfigured if same values are
- * passed to pwm_config() next time.
- */
- for (i = 0; i < SAMSUNG_PWM_NUM; ++i) {
- struct pwm_device *pwm = &chip->chip.pwms[i];
+ for (i = 0; i < SAMSUNG_PWM_NUM; i++) {
+ struct pwm_device *pwm = &chip->pwms[i];
struct samsung_pwm_channel *chan = pwm_get_chip_data(pwm);
if (!chan)
continue;
- chan->period_ns = 0;
- chan->duty_ns = 0;
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
+ if (our_chip->variant.output_mask & BIT(i))
+ pwm_samsung_set_invert(our_chip, i,
+ our_chip->inverter_mask & BIT(i));
-static int pwm_samsung_resume(struct device *dev)
-{
- struct samsung_pwm_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
- unsigned int chan;
+ if (chan->period_ns) {
+ __pwm_samsung_config(chip, pwm, chan->duty_ns,
+ chan->period_ns, true);
+ /* needed to make PWM disable work on Odroid-XU3 */
+ pwm_samsung_manual_update(our_chip, pwm);
+ }
- /*
- * Inverter setting must be preserved across suspend/resume
- * as nobody really seems to configure it more than once.
- */
- for (chan = 0; chan < SAMSUNG_PWM_NUM; ++chan) {
- if (chip->variant.output_mask & BIT(chan))
- pwm_samsung_set_invert(chip, chan,
- chip->inverter_mask & BIT(chan));
+ if (our_chip->disabled_mask & BIT(i))
+ pwm_samsung_disable(chip, pwm);
+ else
+ pwm_samsung_enable(chip, pwm);
}
return 0;
}
#endif
-static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(pwm_samsung_pm_ops, pwm_samsung_suspend,
- pwm_samsung_resume);
+static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(pwm_samsung_pm_ops, NULL, pwm_samsung_resume);
static struct platform_driver pwm_samsung_driver = {
.driver = {
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 3/3] hwmon: pwm-fan: remove no longer needed suspend/resume code
2017-04-24 10:01 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] pwm: pwm-samsung: fix suspend/resume support Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2017-04-24 10:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] pwm: pwm-samsung: remove redundant checks from pwm_samsung_config() Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2017-04-24 10:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] pwm: pwm-samsung: fix suspend/resume support Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
@ 2017-04-24 10:01 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2017-06-29 11:14 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] pwm: pwm-samsung: fix suspend/resume support Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz @ 2017-04-24 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thierry Reding, Jean Delvare, Guenter Roeck, Kamil Debski
Cc: Tomasz Figa, linux-pwm, linux-hwmon, linux-kernel,
linux-samsung-soc, b.zolnierkie
The suspend/resume is now properly handled by pwm-samsung driver
(pwm-fan is currently only used by ARM Exynos boards) and the old
code only handles ctx->pwm_value != 0 case. Just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
---
drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c | 32 --------------------------------
1 file changed, 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c b/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
index f9af393..9dc40f3 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
@@ -302,37 +302,6 @@ static int pwm_fan_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
return 0;
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
-static int pwm_fan_suspend(struct device *dev)
-{
- struct pwm_fan_ctx *ctx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
-
- if (ctx->pwm_value)
- pwm_disable(ctx->pwm);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int pwm_fan_resume(struct device *dev)
-{
- struct pwm_fan_ctx *ctx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
- struct pwm_args pargs;
- unsigned long duty;
- int ret;
-
- if (ctx->pwm_value == 0)
- return 0;
-
- pwm_get_args(ctx->pwm, &pargs);
- duty = DIV_ROUND_UP(ctx->pwm_value * (pargs.period - 1), MAX_PWM);
- ret = pwm_config(ctx->pwm, duty, pargs.period);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
- return pwm_enable(ctx->pwm);
-}
-#endif
-
-static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(pwm_fan_pm, pwm_fan_suspend, pwm_fan_resume);
-
static const struct of_device_id of_pwm_fan_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "pwm-fan", },
{},
@@ -344,7 +313,6 @@ static int pwm_fan_resume(struct device *dev)
.remove = pwm_fan_remove,
.driver = {
.name = "pwm-fan",
- .pm = &pwm_fan_pm,
.of_match_table = of_pwm_fan_match,
},
};
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] pwm: pwm-samsung: fix suspend/resume support
2017-04-24 10:01 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] pwm: pwm-samsung: fix suspend/resume support Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2017-04-24 10:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] hwmon: pwm-fan: remove no longer needed suspend/resume code Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
@ 2017-06-29 11:14 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz @ 2017-06-29 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thierry Reding
Cc: Jean Delvare, Guenter Roeck, Kamil Debski, Tomasz Figa, linux-pwm,
linux-hwmon, linux-kernel, linux-samsung-soc
ping. Could this patchset be merged for 4.13, please?
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
On Monday, April 24, 2017 12:01:06 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patchset fixes suspend/resume support in pwm-samsung
> driver (which has an effect of fixing suspend/resume support
> for PWM client drivers such as pwm-fan one). Then it removes
> no longer needed suspend/resume code from pwm-fan driver.
>
> It was tested on Odroid-XU3 board (with few extra patches
> adding SoC/board suspend/resume support which are not in
> upstream yet).
>
> The initial issue that has been observed on this configuration
> was that after suspend/resume operation the fan was turned on
> (while the thermal code had explicitly disabled the fan by
> calling back into pwm-fan driver before the suspend/resume).
>
> Fixing this in the pwm-fan driver itself is not feasible since
> pwm_config()/pwm_disable() & co. API saves information about
> current state and doesn't pass the relevant values to PWM core
> if they are identical to the ones used previously (moreover PWM
> core itself does the same before calling into the PWM hardware
> driver).
>
> Changes since v1
> (https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2480445.html):
> - added Acked-by from Guenter to patch #3
> - fixed patch #2 to use the right variable (chip -> our_chip)
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
> Samsung Electronics
>
>
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz (3):
> pwm: pwm-samsung: remove redundant checks from pwm_samsung_config()
> pwm: pwm-samsung: fix suspend/resume support
> hwmon: pwm-fan: remove no longer needed suspend/resume code
>
> drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c | 32 ----------------------
> drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread