From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Return-path: Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 10:59:23 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Jae Hyun Yoo , joel@jms.id.au, andrew@aj.id.au, arnd@arndb.de, jdelvare@suse.com, linux@roeck-us.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org, Jae Hyun Yoo Subject: Re: [PATCH linux dev-4.10 0/6] Add support PECI and PECI hwmon drivers Message-ID: <20180111095923.GA29233@kroah.com> References: <20180109223126.13093-1-jae.hyun.yoo@linux.intel.com> <20180110101755.GA5822@kroah.com> <006c4a95-9299-bd17-6dec-52578e8461ae@linux.intel.com> <20180110191703.GA20248@kroah.com> <8997e43c-683e-418d-4e2b-1fe3fefe254e@linux.intel.com> <20180110202740.GA27703@kroah.com> <20180111073038.GA3600@kroah.com> <1515661011.31850.27.camel@au1.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1515661011.31850.27.camel@au1.ibm.com> List-ID: On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 07:56:51PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 08:30 +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > 4.13? Why that kernel? It too is obsolete and insecure and > > unsupported. > > Haha, it's n-1. come on :-) And, if you use it in a device, it's still totally unsupported and insecure. Seriously, does no one actually pay attention to the patches I merge in the stable trees anymore? Anyway, your other comments are good, glad to see work is progressing well, and yes it's better than a 2.6.y based kernel, but really, that's a low bar... thanks, greg k-h