From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:33964 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728133AbeKFRwL (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Nov 2018 12:52:11 -0500 Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 09:27:59 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: "Woods, Brian" Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , "x86@kernel.org" , Clemens Ladisch , Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck , Bjorn Helgaas , Pu Wen , Jia Zhang , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/amd_nb: add support for newer PCI topologies Message-ID: <20181106082759.GA13712@zn.tnic> References: <20181102181055.130531-1-brian.woods@amd.com> <20181102181055.130531-3-brian.woods@amd.com> <20181105193840.GA26868@zn.tnic> <20181105203330.GB27399@amd.com> <20181105214233.GF26868@zn.tnic> <20181105233212.GC27399@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181105233212.GC27399@amd.com> Sender: linux-hwmon-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 11:32:16PM +0000, Woods, Brian wrote: > Your understanding is correct. It's more so that the following DF/SMN > interface gets mapped correctly. > /* > * If there are more PCI root devices than data fabric/ > * system management network interfaces, then the (N) > * PCI roots per DF/SMN interface are functionally the > * same (for DF/SMN access) and N-1 are redundant. N-1 > * PCI roots should be skipped per DF/SMN interface so > * the following DF/SMN interfaces get mapped to > * correct PCI roots. > */ > Does that read clearer? Yap, thanks! -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.