From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E51C4741F for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 14:59:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A262067B for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 14:59:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=posteo.net header.i=@posteo.net header.b="PXmX599I" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730977AbgKEO76 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2020 09:59:58 -0500 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:44803 "EHLO mout02.posteo.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728371AbgKEO76 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2020 09:59:58 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B575E240101 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 15:59:55 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1604588395; bh=ZvLSPE52lPHFBlIfJ9oWOiy2A/99HXQsbJtnOXoWBTM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:From; b=PXmX599IeHHbu/YbDaFMMf3Qybjy6D/OwFaO5Y6K29vkALY32UL6oqF3U+JAkyrX1 CSeEj51ipKQCBBUqQh2BqG9YmVl9JXxpK62qww/kiCAIbXh/tEQbdwc+VDr5PrA96f ZyF7yFy32rdqHxZGHMjWX9OiY0aTKUH+PbQjsX8YTxfDsFnC7vtd5M4tSjutFRouab 8HQ+rmp1MZgmF45sktgXE9t0gtSTUsfKqf4w3Zm+hsMXbeMaQBj/162ggLnziPIVwD qyctPBnvCinStmiI1cIzgtrS86pIeJOLg+M8f0vsQ19TMiWABNPvhzN+xVs/RG+jbK 5X32wGzkJEcog== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4CRms65Jptz6tmK; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 15:59:54 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 15:59:52 +0100 From: Wilken Gottwalt To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Colin King , Jean Delvare , linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] hwmon: corsair-psu: fix unintentional sign extension issue Message-ID: <20201105155952.1db127bd@monster.powergraphx.local> In-Reply-To: <20201105141549.GA1389@roeck-us.net> References: <20201105115019.41735-1-colin.king@canonical.com> <20201105133233.10edda5b@monster.powergraphx.local> <20201105141549.GA1389@roeck-us.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 06:15:49 -0800 Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 01:32:33PM +0100, Wilken Gottwalt wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 11:50:19 +0000 > > Colin King wrote: > > > > > From: Colin Ian King > > > > > > The shifting of the u8 integer data[3] by 24 bits to the left will > > > be promoted to a 32 bit signed int and then sign-extended to a > > > long. In the event that the top bit of data[3] is set then all > > > then all the upper 32 bits of a 64 bit long end up as also being > > > set because of the sign-extension. Fix this by casting data[3] to > > > a long before the shift. > > > > > > Addresses-Coverity: ("Unintended sign extension") > > > Fixes: ce15cd2cee8b ("hwmon: add Corsair PSU HID controller driver") > > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King > > > --- > > > drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c b/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c > > > index e92d0376e7ac..5d19a888231a 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c > > > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c > > > @@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ static int corsairpsu_get_value(struct corsairpsu_data *priv, u8 cmd, u8 > > > rail, l > > > * the LINEAR11 conversion are the watts values which are about 1200 for the > > > strongest psu > > > * supported (HX1200i) > > > */ > > > - tmp = (data[3] << 24) + (data[2] << 16) + (data[1] << 8) + data[0]; > > > + tmp = ((long)data[3] << 24) + (data[2] << 16) + (data[1] << 8) + data[0]; > > > switch (cmd) { > > > case PSU_CMD_IN_VOLTS: > > > case PSU_CMD_IN_AMPS: > > > > Yeah, this could happen if the uptime value in the micro-controller gets bigger > > than 68 years (in seconds), and it is the only value which actually uses more > > than 2 bytes for the representation. So what about architectures which are 32 bit > > wide and where a long has 32 bits? I guess this simple cast is not enough. > > > > The hwmon subsystem uses 'long' to pass values back to the core. > While that may be a bit unfortunate as it doesn't support uptimes > of more than 68 years in seconds, we are not going to change the > hwmon core to accommodate it. If the incoming data is always > expected to be positive, and you don't want to risk the overflow, > feel free to either use "data[3] & 0x7f" instead, or max out the > result at INT_MAX (from ). > > Thanks, > Guenter And it is basically impossible to hit the 68 years. For example here are the values for my psu, which I got about 6 years ago (2014 is the first year it was sold) and which runs 8-20 hours nearly every day: 656 day(s), 21:26:34, that are not even 2 years. And we are talking about gaming PSUs here, which no sane person would put into a server where it runs 24/7. And if so, it wouldn't survive 10 uptime years, not to mention 68 years. I'm pretty sure that the fan in my PSU is somewhat damaged already (hence the best guess fan value calculation). So yes, technically it is not perfect but practically it doesn't make much sense here trying to find the perfect solution. It will only introduce unnecessary complexity for a scenario which is so unlikely to happen at all. I actually spent a lot of time thinking about it, and this is the most practical solution I found - and which made Guenter happy ;-) Though, I must admit there is a way to solve this problem - by making chained requests and get all values at once and parse/split the response. You can easily join all requests in this 64 bytes hid message. But this may not work reliable for all supported devices. I already encountered issues while joining rail select and read a rail value. It would at least increase the complexity to quite a new level. greetings, Wilken