From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, corbet@lwn.net,
fenghua.yu@intel.com, jdelvare@suse.com, linux@roeck-us.net,
len.brown@intel.com, rui.zhang@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] x86/topology: Fix duplicated core_id within a package
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2022 00:41:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220812164144.30829-3-rui.zhang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220812164144.30829-1-rui.zhang@intel.com>
Today, core_id is assumed to be unique within each package.
But an AlderLake-N platform adds a Module level between core and package,
Linux excludes the unknown modules bits from the core_id, resulting in
duplicate core_id's.
To keep core_id unique within a package, Linux must include all APIC-id
bits for known or un-known levels above the core and below the package
in the core_id.
It is important to understand that core_id's have always come directly
from the APIC-id encoding, which comes from the BIOS. Thus there is no
guarantee that they start at 0, or that they are contiguous.
As such, using them for array indexes can be problematic.
Suggested-and-reviewed-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c
index f7592814e5d5..5e868b62a7c4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ int detect_extended_topology(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
sub_index++;
}
- core_select_mask = (~(-1 << core_plus_mask_width)) >> ht_mask_width;
+ core_select_mask = (~(-1 << pkg_mask_width)) >> ht_mask_width;
die_select_mask = (~(-1 << die_plus_mask_width)) >>
core_plus_mask_width;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-12 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-12 16:41 [PATCH 0/7] x86/topology: Improve CPUID.1F handling Zhang Rui
2022-08-12 16:41 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86/topology: Fix multiple packages shown on a single-package system Zhang Rui
2022-08-12 16:41 ` Zhang Rui [this message]
2022-08-12 16:41 ` [PATCH 3/7] hwmon/coretemp: Handle large core id value Zhang Rui
2022-08-12 17:16 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-08-13 17:24 ` Zhang Rui
2022-08-13 10:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2022-08-13 17:07 ` Zhang Rui
2022-08-14 9:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2022-08-12 16:41 ` [PATCH 4/7] x86/topology: Fix max_siblings calculation Zhang Rui
2022-08-12 16:41 ` [PATCH 5/7] Documentation: x86: Update smp_num_siblings/x86_max_cores description Zhang Rui
2022-08-12 16:41 ` [PATCH 6/7] Documentation: x86: Remove obsolete x86_max_dies description Zhang Rui
2022-08-12 16:41 ` [PATCH 7/7] perf/x86/intel/P4: Fix smp_num_siblings usage Zhang Rui
2022-08-13 10:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2022-08-13 17:29 ` Zhang Rui
2022-08-15 9:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-16 2:26 ` Zhang Rui
2022-08-16 8:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-13 10:44 ` [PATCH 0/7] x86/topology: Improve CPUID.1F handling Ingo Molnar
2022-08-13 17:10 ` Zhang Rui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220812164144.30829-3-rui.zhang@intel.com \
--to=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox