From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89CB0C4332F for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 23:40:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230169AbiKAXkK (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2022 19:40:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59014 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230116AbiKAXkI (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2022 19:40:08 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x62a.google.com (mail-pl1-x62a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C25B21CB25 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 16:40:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id p21so11141878plr.7 for ; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 16:40:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=HMjoSMseYo9dv+OYtpDQcotuckgj0OnEhXYZObymQfA=; b=N4bCntNKJyNrCrWRnxFbKWGV538e38A/akJR4zZz/OuvuV1Bx92CKGBWkW4XIkb+mg at2PxLtvS+9V8fzxowpA0pMEHI/pFRmIUoF3dIlw96H4BwhgK79jOTHaNSb4ib3bQqJE AjvoxglA+JnoO3xYI+DkujScXt/j12hqgfLIs= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=HMjoSMseYo9dv+OYtpDQcotuckgj0OnEhXYZObymQfA=; b=5b4P1tUSv9NfO7JaGo6D1O5QjhYuxLTRDHNcSv/fZ1S72QhfW9KCNRYHluCNAOF7EB 0TTAv0CyH2uJXd+OugAfoOVMU6dvRPRF92TCJQlv7WZ2g2uOfFNJW6vP7/pUpTkTssin 5+ftYSyrjOj6lO8RjZPNZEpyrNZ8FIckV0K6OhXidp+gxGy3aXQOUsCb0zJNL23GNPTi 2TINWxNMkFLQ3W/lcPan4Vtg8rEN6Bm2dYCcv4F4QmyZZmdvHJlgVSqPQ52iWWT72wug G4J9UYe+tY9gO2kxyKwsv3ih+8PC7Yz/Z3+f34h0sRqMk5ZoUMDLymTU91IUPWs/CxCg s8tg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf02dxYNDx2I1ch3A/8+Op7hhcoq1wuCZWtJL8uI3vnHabcLnLvZ 7NjW7VuRnCShJCFeIqZmH9+X8g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4P4eIG6ZNPzEizuQdoi/YqYr8KPBMw3NArEJ1RJ/GARU4RtwCb2NPtiryMlgBp+ThPDf6xZw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:33c3:b0:213:f5be:c3ad with SMTP id lk3-20020a17090b33c300b00213f5bec3admr9845989pjb.123.1667346007336; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 16:40:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 20-20020a621714000000b0056ded8d5918sm636830pfx.134.2022.11.01.16.40.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 01 Nov 2022 16:40:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 16:40:05 -0700 From: Kees Cook To: "Fabio M. De Francesco" Cc: Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , Alex Deucher , Alex Deucher , "Pan, Xinhui" , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Christian Brauner , Sumit Semwal , Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck , amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, "Venkataramanan, Anirudh" , Ira Weiny Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: Replace kmap() with kmap_local_page() Message-ID: <202211011639.4938CC9@keescook> References: <20221013210714.16320-1-fmdefrancesco@gmail.com> <1942083.usQuhbGJ8B@suse> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1942083.usQuhbGJ8B@suse> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 12:11:53AM +0100, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote: > On luned́ 17 ottobre 2022 18:52:10 CET Alex Deucher wrote: > > Applied. Thanks! > > Many thanks to you! > > However, about a week ago, I received a report saying that this patch is "Not > Applicable". > > That email was also referring to another patch, for which I'll reply in its > own thread. > > That report has a link to https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/ > patch/20221013210714.16320-1-fmdefrancesco@gmail.com/ > > Can you please let me understand why, despite it was applied, this patch later > shifted "State" to "Not Applicable"? The kernel has multiple patchwork instances, so you got an "N/A" from linux-media, but it was applied to the drm tree. (Yes, confusing. :P) -- Kees Cook