public inbox for linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@broadcom.com>,
	James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>, Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@hpe.com>,
	Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>,
	Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>,
	Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@hpe.com>
Subject: [patch 24/29] x86/mm/numa: Use core domain size on AMD
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 19:44:28 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230724172845.093176653@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20230724155329.474037902@linutronix.de

cpuinfo::topo::x86_coreid_bits is about to be phased out. Use the core
domain size from the topology information.

Add a comment why the early MPTABLE parsing is required and decrapify the
loop which sets the APIC ID to node map.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
 arch/x86/mm/amdtopology.c |   35 ++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology.c
@@ -54,13 +54,11 @@ static __init int find_northbridge(void)
 
 int __init amd_numa_init(void)
 {
-	u64 start = PFN_PHYS(0);
+	unsigned int numnodes, cores, apicid;
+	u64 prevbase, start = PFN_PHYS(0);
 	u64 end = PFN_PHYS(max_pfn);
-	unsigned numnodes;
-	u64 prevbase;
-	int i, j, nb;
 	u32 nodeid, reg;
-	unsigned int bits, cores, apicid_base;
+	int i, j, nb;
 
 	if (!early_pci_allowed())
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -158,26 +156,25 @@ int __init amd_numa_init(void)
 		return -ENOENT;
 
 	/*
-	 * We seem to have valid NUMA configuration.  Map apicids to nodes
-	 * using the coreid bits from early_identify_cpu.
+	 * We seem to have valid NUMA configuration. Map apicids to nodes
+	 * using the size of the core domain in the APIC space.
 	 */
-	bits = boot_cpu_data.x86_coreid_bits;
-	cores = 1 << bits;
-	apicid_base = 0;
+	cores = topology_get_domain_size(TOPO_CORE_DOMAIN);
 
 	/*
-	 * get boot-time SMP configuration:
+	 * Scan MPTABLE to map the local APIC and ensure that the boot CPU
+	 * APIC ID is valid. This is required because on pre ACPI/SRAT
+	 * systems IO-APICs are mapped before the boot CPU.
 	 */
 	early_get_smp_config();
 
-	if (boot_cpu_physical_apicid > 0) {
-		pr_info("BSP APIC ID: %02x\n", boot_cpu_physical_apicid);
-		apicid_base = boot_cpu_physical_apicid;
+	apicid = boot_cpu_physical_apicid;
+	if (apicid > 0)
+		pr_info("BSP APIC ID: %02x\n", apicid);
+
+	for_each_node_mask(i, numa_nodes_parsed) {
+		for (j = 0; j < cores; j++, apicid++)
+			set_apicid_to_node(apicid, i);
 	}
-
-	for_each_node_mask(i, numa_nodes_parsed)
-		for (j = apicid_base; j < cores + apicid_base; j++)
-			set_apicid_to_node((i << bits) + j, i);
-
 	return 0;
 }


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-24 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-24 17:43 [patch 00/29] x86/cpu: Rework the topology evaluation Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-24 17:43 ` [patch 01/29] x86/cpu: Encapsulate topology information in cpuinfo_x86 Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-25  7:46   ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-24 17:43 ` [patch 02/29] x86/cpu: Move phys_proc_id into topology info Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-24 17:43 ` [patch 03/29] x86/cpu: Move cpu_die_id " Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-24 17:43 ` [patch 04/29] scsi: lpfc: Use topology_core_id() Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-24 17:43 ` [patch 05/29] hwmon: (fam15h_power) " Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-24 17:53   ` Guenter Roeck
2023-07-24 17:43 ` [patch 06/29] x86/cpu: Move cpu_core_id into topology info Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-24 17:44 ` [patch 07/29] x86/cpu: Move cu_id " Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-24 17:44 ` [patch 08/29] x86/cpu: Remove pointless evaluation of x86_coreid_bits Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-24 17:44 ` [patch 09/29] x86/cpu: Move logical package and die IDs into topology info Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-24 17:44 ` [patch 10/29] x86/cpu: Move cpu_l[l2]c_id " Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-24 17:44 ` [patch 11/29] x86/cpu: Provide debug interface Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-24 17:44 ` [patch 12/29] x86/cpu: Provide cpuid_read() et al Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-24 17:44 ` [patch 13/29] x86/cpu: Provide cpu_init/parse_topology() Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-24 17:44 ` [patch 14/29] x86/cpu: Add legacy topology parser Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-24 17:44 ` [patch 15/29] x86/cpu: Use common topology code for Centaur and Zhaoxin Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-24 17:44 ` [patch 16/29] x86/cpu: Move __max_die_per_package to common.c Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-24 17:44 ` [patch 17/29] x86/cpu: Provide a sane leaf 0xb/0x1f parser Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-24 20:49   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-24 21:02     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-25  6:51     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-24 17:44 ` [patch 18/29] x86/cpu: Use common topology code for Intel Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-24 17:44 ` [patch 19/29] x86/cpu/amd: Provide a separate acessor for Node ID Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-24 17:44 ` [patch 20/29] x86/cpu: Provide an AMD/HYGON specific topology parser Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-24 17:44 ` [patch 21/29] x86/smpboot: Teach it about topo.amd_node_id Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-24 17:44 ` [patch 22/29] x86/cpu: Use common topology code for AMD Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-24 17:44 ` [patch 23/29] x86/cpu: Use common topology code for HYGON Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-24 17:44 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2023-07-24 17:44 ` [patch 25/29] x86/cpu: Make topology_amd_node_id() use the actual node info Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-24 17:44 ` [patch 26/29] x86/cpu: Remove topology.c Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-24 17:44 ` [patch 27/29] x86/cpu: Remove x86_coreid_bits Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-24 17:44 ` [patch 28/29] x86/apic: Remove unused phys_pkg_id() callback Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-24 17:44 ` [patch 29/29] x86/apic/uv: Remove the private leaf 0xb parser Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-24 21:05 ` [patch 00/29] x86/cpu: Rework the topology evaluation Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-25 20:17 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2023-07-26 22:15 ` Sohil Mehta
2023-07-26 22:38   ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-26 23:27     ` Sohil Mehta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230724172845.093176653@linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dick.kennedy@broadcom.com \
    --cc=dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com \
    --cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=mike.travis@hpe.com \
    --cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
    --cc=russ.anderson@hpe.com \
    --cc=steve.wahl@hpe.com \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox