From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qk1-f174.google.com (mail-qk1-f174.google.com [209.85.222.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B47A381CB for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2023 23:17:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=iwanders.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iwanders.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=iwanders.net header.i=@iwanders.net header.b="chNSw9k3" Received: by mail-qk1-f174.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7811d1e68b0so159117985a.2 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2023 15:17:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iwanders.net; s=google; t=1703287029; x=1703891829; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7CpW3HQ3edIB3pC1X9J+ZszFBlQ3pCTa21G/iZStcgk=; b=chNSw9k3tyBBgPYw368jZIK4B/DunMkafbHBcScFFElE9LbZVaHnoY6/WC1411wKc1 qKENLCvlnT6EwlBVRhes/VZczfvM++sNQqp4b3Bzi/Y7+XVEEPBdcLOqaN0RqovkQQtC iniERB8qCeQ3xG+6mVjD2hF/2CE5XWsSPWA0g= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1703287029; x=1703891829; h=references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7CpW3HQ3edIB3pC1X9J+ZszFBlQ3pCTa21G/iZStcgk=; b=tUHcCxI11qL45Kyo1dLFW/2lhGhmBkkpinJnQN+3K48QexFCbLSXQfKAtvf7fgbbbs CrFtKoo4k59UXzXPmQMVbsUZRoitP81BtPRwmzKlXMK0O589+IVMSXH8aKmuGkRNfAjp bjvPnZUfjY0kZeC+Ba5d1/YXSlloCtTMkhMrm2RnoIsBRoAi6FLYaUWGOsTr5Qod+Fa1 2si4nNwIKpSxFcsQ+YwXFFOzcnBiBUrFZMXyiZZyFocgY/H+rlWhnKIg8EDTPDxdVHx8 qvPpxpcxaMq6kPtd2yPtwTmgBo8wDJipjWEP9Qh+czpwIvC4+/pkKFAFjFiXiZ27MTSX q3jw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy7wYiFh8JjS3crNP5IwZ2TloUbX52ZKwmXoUXJCL9NbC7QsngN TZ+5PLuZD9KJdwN/NnzWeqBEgus07YB3FNhLJnlX7XqZhQ4ugg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHS2SZicxvBAydDZ0dczVgPVcMjllDPAaqVKpGvtypPcvbU5dRrD+q0Cevn+jgytzUmjAUkXw== X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5dc6:0:b0:67f:43ef:c8df with SMTP id m6-20020ad45dc6000000b0067f43efc8dfmr2476193qvh.98.1703287029358; Fri, 22 Dec 2023 15:17:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from eagle.lan (24-246-30-234.cable.teksavvy.com. [24.246.30.234]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id gc7-20020a05622a59c700b004260c76e4eesm2221739qtb.27.2023.12.22.15.17.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 22 Dec 2023 15:17:08 -0800 (PST) From: Ivor Wanders To: linux@roeck-us.net Cc: corbet@lwn.net, ivor@iwanders.net, jdelvare@suse.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, luzmaximilian@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] clarify intent of fan min and max attributes Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 18:17:05 -0500 Message-Id: <20231222231705.4338-1-ivor@iwanders.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > I do not see the point of clarifying this for individual attributes, > especially since that might create the impression that it would possibly > not apply to other attributes (for those not reading the above > documentation). Okay, fair point, I can see that lead to more confusion indeed. ~Ivor