From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Gui-Dong Han" <hanguidong02@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] hwmon: (lm63) Convert macro to function to avoid TOCTOU
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 10:41:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260416104136.63F14C2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260416090752.97392-1-hanguidong02@gmail.com>
Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s):
- [High] Incomplete TOCTOU fix allows compiler-induced divide-by-zero crash in `show_fan()`.
- [Medium] Lockless sysfs read in `show_fan()` causes torn reads and violates hwmon subsystem locking guidelines.
--
commit ebc10731137639981842ea19f80f0b969db71842
Author: Gui-Dong Han <hanguidong02@gmail.com>
hwmon: (lm63) Convert macro to function to avoid TOCTOU
The patch converts the FAN_FROM_REG macro to a static function
fan_from_reg() to evaluate its argument only once, avoiding a TOCTOU
race and potential divide-by-zero error.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hwmon/CALbr=LYJ_ehtp53HXEVkSpYoub+XYSTU8Rg=o1xxMJ8=5z8B-g@mail.gmail.com/
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm63.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm63.c
> index 035176a98ce9c..da132b267c584 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm63.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm63.c
> @@ -109,8 +109,14 @@ static const unsigned short normal_i2c[] = { 0x18, 0x4c, 0x4e, I2C_CLIENT_END };
> * adapted accordingly.
> */
>
> -#define FAN_FROM_REG(reg) ((reg) == 0xFFFC || (reg) == 0 ? 0 : \
> - 5400000 / (reg))
> +static int fan_from_reg(int reg)
> +{
> + if (reg == 0xFFFC || reg == 0)
> + return 0;
> +
> + return 5400000 / reg;
> +}
> +
[ ... ]
> @@ -333,7 +339,7 @@ static ssize_t show_fan(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
> {
> struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
> struct lm63_data *data = lm63_update_device(dev);
> - return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", FAN_FROM_REG(data->fan[attr->index]));
> + return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", fan_from_reg(data->fan[attr->index]));
Since fan_from_reg() is a small static function, won't the compiler likely
inline it?
If it gets inlined, couldn't the compiler optimize the code by reloading
data->fan[attr->index] from memory multiple times (once for the 0 check, and
again for the division)?
If lm63_update_device() concurrently writes to data->fan[0] in two non-atomic
steps (where the first step can momentarily set the value to 0), and a reload
happens exactly when the value is 0, could this still cause a divide-by-zero
panic?
Note that the subsequent patch in the series ('hwmon: (lm63) Add locking
to avoid TOCTOU') explicitly skips show_fan(), leaving this unfixed.
Additionally, is it safe to read data->fan locklessly here?
According to the hwmon subsystem guidelines, drivers must implement locking
for attributes registered outside the core-serialized info API. Because this
driver registers its attributes using devm_hwmon_device_register_with_groups(),
it should lock its attribute accesses.
Since lm63_update_device() releases the update_lock before returning, and
data->fan[0] is updated non-atomically in two steps, couldn't a concurrent
sysfs read observe a partially updated 16-bit state?
Could this torn read result in wildly inaccurate fan speed values being
reported? The subsequent patch ('hwmon: (lm63) Add locking to avoid TOCTOU')
fixes similar locking issues but explicitly omits show_fan().
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260416090752.97392-1-hanguidong02@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-16 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-16 9:07 [PATCH 1/2] hwmon: (lm63) Convert macro to function to avoid TOCTOU Gui-Dong Han
2026-04-16 9:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: (lm63) Add locking " Gui-Dong Han
2026-04-16 11:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-16 13:22 ` Gui-Dong Han
2026-04-16 10:41 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-04-16 13:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] hwmon: (lm63) Convert macro to function " Gui-Dong Han
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260416104136.63F14C2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=hanguidong02@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox