From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Tabrez Ahmed" <tabreztalks@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] hwmon: (ads7871) Use DMA-safe buffer for SPI writes
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2026 04:56:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260418045655.2EB12C19424@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260418034601.90226-4-tabreztalks@gmail.com>
Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s):
- [High] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but in `ads7871_read_reg16`, a pointer to a 32-bit `int` (`®`) is passed to `spi_write_then_read` to transmit a 1-byte command, which breaks register reads on big-endian architectures.
--
commit 4c76d6fe3d1664a2cf635cd569d8b01aeed70678
Author: Tabrez Ahmed <tabreztalks@gmail.com>
hwmon: (ads7871) Use DMA-safe buffer for SPI writes
This commit migrates the SPI write operations in the ads7871 driver to use a
DMA-safe, cacheline-aligned buffer allocated in the driver's private data
structure instead of using a stack-allocated buffer. It also adjusts the scale
calculation for 14-bit data.
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/ads7871.c b/drivers/hwmon/ads7871.c
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/ads7871.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/ads7871.c
> @@ -97,11 +98,12 @@ static int ads7871_read_reg16(struct spi_device *spi, int reg)
> return get_unaligned_le16(buf);
> }
[ ... ]
This wasn't introduced by this patch, but since you are fixing
architecture-specific compatibility issues here, I noticed something in
ads7871_read_reg16() just above this diff.
Does passing a pointer to a 32-bit int (®) to spi_write_then_read()
for transmitting a 1-byte command break register reads on big-endian
architectures?
static int ads7871_read_reg16(struct spi_device *spi, int reg)
{
...
reg = reg | INST_READ_BM | INST_16BIT_BM;
ret = spi_write_then_read(spi, ®, 1, buf, 2);
...
}
On little-endian architectures, this correctly reads the least significant
byte containing the command. On big-endian architectures, wouldn't it read
the most significant byte (0x00) instead, sending an invalid command to
the hardware?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260418034601.90226-1-tabreztalks@gmail.com?part=3
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-18 4:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-18 3:45 [PATCH v3 0/3] hwmon: (ads7871) Modernize and fix DMA safety Tabrez Ahmed
2026-04-18 3:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] hwmon: (ads7871) Fix endianness bug in 16-bit register reads Tabrez Ahmed
2026-04-18 4:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-18 3:46 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] hwmon: (ads7871) Convert to hwmon_device_register_with_info Tabrez Ahmed
2026-04-18 3:46 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] hwmon: (ads7871) Use DMA-safe buffer for SPI writes Tabrez Ahmed
2026-04-18 4:56 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260418045655.2EB12C19424@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tabreztalks@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox