public inbox for linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: mkoutny@suse.com, tj@kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
	hannes@cmpxchg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/23] sched/core: Use RCU to protect access of HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE cpumask
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 03:09:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260422030902.4F95FC2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260421030351.281436-14-longman@redhat.com>

Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s):
- [High] The commit message incorrectly claims that `housekeeping_cpumask()` will warn if used in an invalid context, masking potential RCU safety violations elsewhere in the kernel. Specifically, `housekeeping_dereference_check(type)` returns `true` for `HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE`, causing `rcu_dereference_all_check()` to bypass the `rcu_read_lock_held()` validation. This false assumption of a safety net led the author to miss unprotected accesses, such as the `housekeeping_show` sysfs handler in `drivers/base/cpu.c` which does not hold `rcu_read_lock()`. Because `housekeeping_update()` replaces and frees the old mask via `kfree()` after `synchronize_rcu()`, concurrent execution of `housekeeping_show()` results in a Use-After-Free. While the lockdep omission is patched later in the series by commit "sched/isolation: Extend housekeeping_dereference_check() to cover changes in nohz_full or manged_irqs cpumasks", the underlying Use-After-Free vulnerability in `drivers/base/cpu.c` remains unfixed throughout the entire series.
--

commit 7a774b36f9d9b430bf7171534b53f6145556f483
Author: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>

sched/core: Use RCU to protect access of HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE cpumask

This commit adds RCU protection to the HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE cpumask in
get_nohz_timer_target(), as the mask can now be changed at runtime. It
also notes that housekeeping_cpumask() will warn if used in an invalid
context.

> As HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE is going to be changeable at run time, use
> RCU to protect access to the cpumask when needed. Some access of the
> HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE cpumask is done inside the tick code that has
> interrupt disabled which is a rcu_read_lock() critical section. Anyway,
> housekeeping_cpumask() will warn if they are used in invalid context.

Is this description accurate? Looking at housekeeping_dereference_check(),
it returns true for HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE, which causes
rcu_dereference_all_check() to bypass the rcu_read_lock_held() validation.
This means lockdep will not warn about missing RCU read locks for this
specific mask.

Because the mask can now be replaced and freed dynamically after
synchronize_rcu(), does this introduce a use-after-free in other readers
that don't hold the RCU read lock?

For example, housekeeping_show() in drivers/base/cpu.c reads this mask to
print it to sysfs:

drivers/base/cpu.c:housekeeping_show() {
    ...
    return sysfs_emit(buf, "%*pbl\n",
                      cpumask_pr_args(housekeeping_cpumask(type)));
}

Since housekeeping_show() doesn't hold rcu_read_lock(), could a concurrent
update of the cpumask cause cpumask_pr_args() to access freed memory?

While the lockdep omission is patched later in this series by the commit
"sched/isolation: Extend housekeeping_dereference_check() to cover changes
in nohz_full or manged_irqs cpumasks", the underlying use-after-free
regression in drivers/base/cpu.c appears to remain unfixed throughout the
series.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260421030351.281436-1-longman@redhat.com?part=13

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-22  3:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-21  3:03 [PATCH-next 00/23] cgroup/cpuset: Enable runtime update of nohz_full and managed_irq CPUs Waiman Long
2026-04-21  3:03 ` [PATCH 01/23] sched/isolation: Add HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE_BOOT & HK_TYPE_MANAGED_IRQ_BOOT Waiman Long
2026-04-21  3:03 ` [PATCH 02/23] sched/isolation: Enhance housekeeping_update() to support updating more than one HK cpumask Waiman Long
2026-04-22  3:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-22  6:39   ` Chen Ridong
2026-04-21  3:03 ` [PATCH 03/23] tick/nohz: Make nohz_full parameter optional Waiman Long
2026-04-21  8:32   ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-21 14:14     ` Waiman Long
2026-04-22  3:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-21  3:03 ` [PATCH 04/23] tick/nohz: Allow runtime changes in full dynticks CPUs Waiman Long
2026-04-21  8:50   ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-21 14:24     ` Waiman Long
2026-04-22  3:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-21  3:03 ` [PATCH 05/23] tick: Pass timer tick job to an online HK CPU in tick_cpu_dying() Waiman Long
2026-04-21  8:55   ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-21 14:22     ` Waiman Long
2026-04-21  3:03 ` [PATCH 06/23] rcu/nocbs: Allow runtime changes in RCU NOCBS cpumask Waiman Long
2026-04-22  3:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-21  3:03 ` [PATCH 07/23] watchdog: Sync up with runtime change of isolated CPUs Waiman Long
2026-04-22  3:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-21  3:03 ` [PATCH 08/23] arm64: topology: Use RCU to protect access to HK_TYPE_TICK cpumask Waiman Long
2026-04-22  3:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-21  3:03 ` [PATCH 09/23] workqueue: Use RCU to protect access of HK_TYPE_TIMER cpumask Waiman Long
2026-04-21  3:03 ` [PATCH 10/23] cpu: " Waiman Long
2026-04-21  8:57   ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-21 14:25     ` Waiman Long
2026-04-21  3:03 ` [PATCH 11/23] hrtimer: " Waiman Long
2026-04-21  8:59   ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-22  3:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-21  3:03 ` [PATCH 12/23] net: Use boot time housekeeping cpumask settings for now Waiman Long
2026-04-21  3:03 ` [PATCH 13/23] sched/core: Use RCU to protect access of HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE cpumask Waiman Long
2026-04-22  3:09   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-04-21  3:03 ` [PATCH 14/23] hwmon/coretemp: Use RCU to protect access of HK_TYPE_MISC cpumask Waiman Long
2026-04-22  3:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-21  3:03 ` [PATCH 15/23] Drivers: hv: Use RCU to protect access of HK_TYPE_MANAGED_IRQ cpumask Waiman Long
2026-04-22  3:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-21  3:03 ` [PATCH 16/23] genirq/cpuhotplug: " Waiman Long
2026-04-21  9:02   ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-21 14:29     ` Waiman Long
2026-04-21  3:03 ` [PATCH 17/23] sched/isolation: Extend housekeeping_dereference_check() to cover changes in nohz_full or manged_irqs cpumasks Waiman Long
2026-04-22  3:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-21  3:03 ` [PATCH 18/23] cpu/hotplug: Add a new cpuhp_offline_cb() API Waiman Long
2026-04-21 16:17   ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-21 17:29     ` Waiman Long
2026-04-21 18:43       ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-22  3:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-21  3:03 ` [PATCH 19/23] cgroup/cpuset: Improve check for calling housekeeping_update() Waiman Long
2026-04-21  3:03 ` [PATCH 20/23] cgroup/cpuset: Enable runtime update of HK_TYPE_{KERNEL_NOISE,MANAGED_IRQ} cpumasks Waiman Long
2026-04-22  3:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-21  3:03 ` [PATCH 21/23] cgroup/cpuset: Limit the side effect of using CPU hotplug on isolated partition Waiman Long
2026-04-22  3:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-21  3:03 ` [PATCH 22/23] cgroup/cpuset: Prevent offline_disabled CPUs from being used in " Waiman Long
2026-04-22  3:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-21  3:03 ` [PATCH 23/23] cgroup/cpuset: Documentation and kselftest updates Waiman Long
2026-04-22  3:09   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260422030902.4F95FC2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox