From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Abdurrahman Hussain via B4 Relay"
<devnull+abdurrahman.nexthop.ai@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] hwmon: (pmbus/adm1266) add powerup_counter debugfs entry
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 00:34:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260512003438.37DDBC2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260510-adm1266-v2-3-3a22b903c2f1@nexthop.ai>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The debugfs read function adm1266_powerup_counter_read() lacks mandatory subsystem locking.
--
commit 7f6c699c3d3803ae6836691f51cc018599b04811
Author: Abdurrahman Hussain <abdurrahman@nexthop.ai>
hwmon: (pmbus/adm1266) add powerup_counter debugfs entry
This commit adds a read-only debugfs file to expose the ADM1266's 16-bit
non-volatile powerup counter.
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/adm1266.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/adm1266.c
> index 31aefa8fc75f5..99e92a8365fb7 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/adm1266.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/adm1266.c
[ ... ]
> +static int adm1266_powerup_counter_read(struct seq_file *s, void *pdata)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = s->private;
> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
> + u8 buf[I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX];
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = i2c_smbus_read_block_data(client, ADM1266_POWERUP_COUNTER, buf);
Does this debugfs read need to be protected by a lock?
The hardware monitoring subsystem guidelines state that drivers must
implement locking for attributes registered outside of the core info
struct, typically using hwmon_lock() or pmbus_lock().
Without synchronization here, could this I2C read interleave with multi-step
PMBus operations from other sysfs attributes or interrupt handlers and break
command atomicity?
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + if (ret != 2)
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + seq_printf(s, "%u\n", buf[0] | (buf[1] << 8));
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260510-adm1266-v2-0-3a22b903c2f1@nexthop.ai?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-12 0:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-11 4:48 [PATCH v2 0/5] hwmon: (pmbus/adm1266) blackbox, FW rev, rtc_class, GPIO label Abdurrahman Hussain via B4 Relay
2026-05-11 4:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] hwmon: (pmbus/adm1266) add firmware_revision debugfs entry Abdurrahman Hussain via B4 Relay
2026-05-11 4:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] hwmon: (pmbus/adm1266) add clear_blackbox " Abdurrahman Hussain via B4 Relay
2026-05-12 0:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-11 4:48 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] hwmon: (pmbus/adm1266) add powerup_counter " Abdurrahman Hussain via B4 Relay
2026-05-12 0:34 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-11 4:48 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] hwmon: (pmbus/adm1266) replace probe-time RTC seed with rtc_class device Abdurrahman Hussain via B4 Relay
2026-05-12 1:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-11 4:48 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] hwmon: (pmbus/adm1266) include adapter number in GPIO line label Abdurrahman Hussain via B4 Relay
2026-05-12 1:31 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260512003438.37DDBC2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=devnull+abdurrahman.nexthop.ai@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox