From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Armin Wolf" <W_Armin@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/9] platform/x86: dell-smbios-wmi: Use new buffer-based WMI API
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 18:43:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260605184311.834EF1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260605181433.188847-4-W_Armin@gmx.de>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] If the ACPI WMI method succeeds but returns no data (an empty object), `wmidev_invoke_method()` sets `output.data` to `ZERO_SIZE_PTR` and returns 0 (success), ignoring `min_size`. `run_smbios_call()` then unconditionally calls `memcpy` with a large `input.length`, dereferencing `ZERO_SIZE_PTR` and causing a kernel panic.
- [High] Use-after-free on character device ioctl/read when the WMI device is unbound while file descriptors remain open.
--
commit e4e7d2c981c6b6b6f52809fa5e1bc882f8e6a92c
Author: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
platform/x86: dell-smbios-wmi: Use new buffer-based WMI API
Use the new buffer-based WMI API to also support ACPI firmware
implementations that do not use ACPI buffers for returning the
results of a SMBIOS call.
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-smbios-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-smbios-wmi.c
> index a7dca8c59d602..64d0871b706e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-smbios-wmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-smbios-wmi.c
> @@ -50,38 +50,32 @@ static inline struct wmi_smbios_priv *get_first_smbios_priv(void)
[ ... ]
> - status = wmidev_evaluate_method(wdev, 0, 1, &input, &output);
> - if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> - return -EIO;
> - obj = (union acpi_object *)output.pointer;
> - if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {
> - dev_dbg(&wdev->dev, "received type: %d\n", obj->type);
> - if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER)
> - dev_dbg(&wdev->dev, "SMBIOS call failed: %llu\n",
> - obj->integer.value);
> - kfree(output.pointer);
> - return -EIO;
> - }
> - memcpy(input.pointer, obj->buffer.pointer, obj->buffer.length);
> + /*
> + * The output buffer returned by the WMI method should have at least the size
> + * of the input buffer.
> + */
> + ret = wmidev_invoke_method(wdev, 0, 1, &input, &output, input.length);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + memcpy(input.data, output.data, input.length);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can this memcpy() cause a kernel panic?
If the ACPI WMI method evaluates successfully but returns no data (an empty
object), wmidev_invoke_method() in drivers/platform/wmi/core.c sets
out->data to ZERO_SIZE_PTR and returns 0:
obj = aout.pointer;
if (!obj) {
out->length = 0;
out->data = ZERO_SIZE_PTR;
return 0;
}
Since wmidev_invoke_method() returns 0 (success) and bypasses the min_size
check, the check for ret < 0 here passes. The memcpy() then unconditionally
dereferences ZERO_SIZE_PTR (0x10) for output.data with input.length, which
will trigger a fatal page fault.
> + kfree(output.data);
> dev_dbg(&wdev->dev, "result: [%08x,%08x,%08x,%08x]\n",
> priv->buf->std.output[0], priv->buf->std.output[1],
> priv->buf->std.output[2], priv->buf->std.output[3]);
[ ... ]
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but could there be a use-after-free if the WMI
device is unbound while file descriptors remain open?
In dell_smbios_wmi_probe(), the driver uses devm_kzalloc() and
devm_get_free_pages() to allocate priv and priv->buf:
priv = devm_kzalloc(&wdev->dev, sizeof(struct wmi_smbios_priv),
GFP_KERNEL);
...
priv->buf = (void *)devm_get_free_pages(&wdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, count);
It registers a misc character device and ties its deregistration to devres.
If a userspace process has the device open when the WMI device is unbound,
devres will execute misc_deregister() and free the memory.
However, misc_deregister() does not revoke existing open file descriptors.
A subsequent ioctl() or read() on the open FD will access the freed priv pointer
and its buf in dell_smbios_wmi_ioctl():
struct wmi_smbios_priv *priv = filp->private_data;
...
ret = dell_smbios_wmi_do_ioctl(priv, input);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260605181433.188847-1-W_Armin@gmx.de?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-05 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-05 18:14 [PATCH v4 0/9] Convert most Dell WMI drivers to use the new buffer-based API Armin Wolf
2026-06-05 18:14 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] platform/x86: dell-descriptor: Use new buffer-based WMI API Armin Wolf
2026-06-05 18:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 18:14 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] platform/x86: dell-privacy: " Armin Wolf
2026-06-05 18:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 18:14 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] platform/x86: dell-smbios-wmi: " Armin Wolf
2026-06-05 18:43 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-05 18:14 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] platform/x86: dell-wmi-base: " Armin Wolf
2026-06-05 18:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 18:14 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] platform/x86: dell-ddv: " Armin Wolf
2026-06-05 19:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 18:14 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] hwmon: (dell-smm) " Armin Wolf
2026-06-05 19:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 18:14 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] platform/wmi: Make wmi_bus_class const Armin Wolf
2026-06-05 19:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 18:14 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] platform/wmi: Make sysfs attributes const Armin Wolf
2026-06-05 19:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 18:14 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] modpost: Handle malformed WMI GUID strings Armin Wolf
2026-06-05 19:24 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260605184311.834EF1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=W_Armin@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox