From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Potin Lai" <potin.lai.pt@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] hwmon: (pmbus/lm25066) add current limit configuration support
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 03:21:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260615032146.C2DEC1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260615-lm25066-cl-config-v2-2-59be46e67d5a@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Telemetry coefficient selection mismatch due to unhandled hardware bit swap for current limit configuration.
--
commit 7163f92448b58cfee498d1fa9089543f75ba9068
Author: Potin Lai <potin.lai.pt@gmail.com>
hwmon: (pmbus/lm25066) add current limit configuration support
This patch adds support for the ti,current-limit devicetree property
to configure the current limit via the DEVICE_SETUP register. It dynamically
handles the Bit 4 mapping for High/Low current limits, which is swapped
for the lm25066 compared to other chips in the family.
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/lm25066.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/lm25066.c
> index dd7275a67a0ab..c8e7aa7c3acd3 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/lm25066.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/lm25066.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -484,6 +485,42 @@ static int lm25066_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>
> data->id = (enum chips)(unsigned long)i2c_get_match_data(client);
>
> + if (data->id != lm25056) {
> + int config_new = config;
> + const char *cl_setting;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!of_property_read_string(client->dev.of_node,
> + "ti,current-limit", &cl_setting)) {
> + config_new |= LM25066_DEV_SETUP_CL_CFG;
> + if (strcmp(cl_setting, "high") == 0) {
> + if (data->id == lm25066)
> + config_new |= LM25066_DEV_SETUP_CL;
> + else
> + config_new &= ~LM25066_DEV_SETUP_CL;
> + } else if (strcmp(cl_setting, "low") == 0) {
> + if (data->id == lm25066)
> + config_new &= ~LM25066_DEV_SETUP_CL;
> + else
> + config_new |= LM25066_DEV_SETUP_CL;
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does the telemetry coefficient
selection further down in lm25066_probe() also need to account for this
hardware bit logic swap?
Later in lm25066_probe(), the coefficient selection unconditionally assumes
Bit 4 (LM25066_DEV_SETUP_CL) being set means the High limit
(coeff[PSC_CURRENT_IN_L]) for all chips:
if (config & LM25066_DEV_SETUP_CL) {
info->m[PSC_CURRENT_IN] = coeff[PSC_CURRENT_IN_L].m;
info->b[PSC_CURRENT_IN] = coeff[PSC_CURRENT_IN_L].b;
info->m[PSC_POWER] = coeff[PSC_POWER_L].m;
info->b[PSC_POWER] = coeff[PSC_POWER_L].b;
} else {
info->m[PSC_CURRENT_IN] = coeff[PSC_CURRENT_IN].m;
info->b[PSC_CURRENT_IN] = coeff[PSC_CURRENT_IN].b;
...
}
For chips like the LM5064, if they are configured for the High current limit,
Bit 4 will be 0 based on the DT parsing logic above.
Could this cause the driver to erroneously select the normal coefficients
(Low current limit) instead of the _L coefficients, potentially throwing the
reported current and power telemetry off by a factor of ~2x?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260615-lm25066-cl-config-v2-0-59be46e67d5a@gmail.com?part=2
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-15 3:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-15 3:07 [PATCH v2 0/2] hwmon: (pmbus/lm25066) Support SMBus Current Limit configuration Potin Lai
2026-06-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: hwmon: pmbus: ti,lm25066: add current limit properties Potin Lai
2026-06-15 3:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 3:28 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-06-15 6:09 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-06-15 6:08 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-06-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] hwmon: (pmbus/lm25066) add current limit configuration support Potin Lai
2026-06-15 3:21 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260615032146.C2DEC1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=potin.lai.pt@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox