From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Flaviu Nistor" <flaviu.nistor@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: (chipcap2) Add support for label
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 12:30:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260622123004.3FEA91F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260622122200.14245-2-flaviu.nistor@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Data race on shared state between threaded interrupt handlers and sysfs context, violating hwmon subsystem guidelines.
--
commit a4752e881c74f908f48e460d6cd5322c3eb88341
Author: Flaviu Nistor <flaviu.nistor@gmail.com>
hwmon: (chipcap2) Add support for label
This commit adds support for the label sysfs attribute to the chipcap2 hwmon
device. This allows for easier identification of individual sensors via the
device tree.
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/chipcap2.c b/drivers/hwmon/chipcap2.c
> index 4aecf463180fd..086571d556b7e 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/chipcap2.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/chipcap2.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -552,6 +559,16 @@ static int cc2_humidity_max_alarm_status(struct cc2_data *data, long *val)
> return 0;
> }
>
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but while reviewing this driver I
noticed a potential data race. Does the driver access and modify shared
variables (rh_alarm.low_alarm) concurrently from both sysfs read paths and
threaded interrupt handlers without locking?
In the sysfs process context, the flag is evaluated and cleared without locks:
drivers/hwmon/chipcap2.c:cc2_humidity_min_alarm_status() {
...
if (data->rh_alarm.low_alarm) {
*val = (measurement < min_hyst) ? 1 : 0;
data->rh_alarm.low_alarm = *val;
} else {
*val = 0;
}
...
}
Concurrently, the threaded interrupt handler sets the flag:
drivers/hwmon/chipcap2.c:cc2_low_interrupt() {
...
if (cc2->process_irqs) {
hwmon_notify_event(cc2->hwmon, hwmon_humidity,
hwmon_humidity_min_alarm, CC2_CHAN_HUMIDITY);
cc2->rh_alarm.low_alarm = true;
}
...
}
The hwmon subsystem guidelines mandate that drivers must implement locking
required for interrupt handling, specifically recommending the use of
hwmon_lock() and hwmon_unlock() to serialize operations. Can these paths
race and cause state corruption or lost alarm events?
> +static int cc2_read_string(struct device *dev, enum hwmon_sensor_types type,
> + u32 attr, int channel, const char **str)
> +{
> + struct cc2_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + *str = data->label;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260622122200.14245-1-flaviu.nistor@gmail.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-22 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-22 12:21 [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: hwmon: chipcap2: Add label property Flaviu Nistor
2026-06-22 12:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: (chipcap2) Add support for label Flaviu Nistor
2026-06-22 12:30 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-22 12:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: hwmon: chipcap2: Add label property sashiko-bot
2026-06-22 16:29 ` Javier Carrasco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260622123004.3FEA91F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=flaviu.nistor@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox