From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] hwmon: (nzxt-smart2) Stop device IO before calling hid_hw_stop
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 02:11:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708021117.0CC251F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708015806.213790-4-linux@roeck-us.net>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Low] Unconditional call to `hid_device_io_stop()` on the error path triggers a spurious kernel warning when `hid_hw_open()` fails.
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] The same Use-After-Free (UAF) vulnerability exists in other HID hwmon drivers (nzxt-kraken3.c and corsair-psu.c) and was missed by this patch series.
- [High] Device removal can hang indefinitely if a user process is blocked reading sysfs attributes.
- [High] The return value of init_device() is silently ignored during probe, leading to permanent hangs on sysfs reads.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH 3/4] hwmon: (nzxt-smart2) Stop device IO before calling hid_hw_stop ---
commit f577839ac93bb28ac70b3214f4e4ddca1a015f5a
Author: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
hwmon: (nzxt-smart2) Stop device IO before calling hid_hw_stop
Calling hid_hw_stop() does not stop the device IO, causing a race condition
between hid_input_report() and probe failure. Fix this by calling
hid_device_io_stop() before calling hid_hw_stop().
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/nzxt-smart2.c b/drivers/hwmon/nzxt-smart2.c
> index 58ef9fa0184be..286de15cedc7d 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/nzxt-smart2.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/nzxt-smart2.c
> @@ -770,6 +770,7 @@ static int nzxt_smart2_hid_probe(struct hid_device *hdev,
> hid_hw_close(hdev);
>
> out_hw_stop:
> + hid_device_io_stop(hdev);
[Severity: Low]
If hid_hw_open() fails earlier in the probe function, we jump to out_hw_stop
and call hid_device_io_stop():
drivers/hwmon/nzxt-smart2.c:nzxt_smart2_hid_probe()
ret = hid_hw_open(hdev);
if (ret)
goto out_hw_stop;
Since hid_device_io_start() hasn't been called yet, does this trigger the
dev_warn("io already stopped") in hid_device_io_stop()?
> hid_hw_stop(hdev);
> return ret;
> }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does ignoring the return value of
init_device() cause sysfs reads to hang?
If init_device() fails to send the 'detect fans' command during
nzxt_smart2_hid_probe(), it appears fan_config_received is never set to true.
Will subsequent sysfs reads block forever in
wait_event_interruptible_locked_irq() waiting for that condition?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does device removal hang if a user
process is currently blocked reading sysfs attributes?
When a process accesses sysfs attributes, nzxt_smart2_hwmon_read() blocks:
drivers/hwmon/nzxt-smart2.c:nzxt_smart2_hwmon_read()
res = wait_event_interruptible_locked_irq(drvdata->wq,
drvdata->fan_config_received);
If the device is unplugged, nzxt_smart2_hid_remove() calls
hwmon_device_unregister(), which waits for active readers to finish:
drivers/hwmon/nzxt-smart2.c:nzxt_smart2_hid_remove()
hwmon_device_unregister(drvdata->hwmon);
Since the waitqueue is never woken up during remove(), does the reader
process stay blocked indefinitely, causing the unregister to hang?
[Severity: Critical]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does the same use-after-free
vulnerability exist in the probe error paths of other HID hwmon drivers?
Both nzxt-kraken3.c and corsair-psu.c appear to call hid_device_io_start()
during probe, but omit hid_device_io_stop() in their fail_and_stop error
paths:
drivers/hwmon/nzxt-kraken3.c:kraken3_probe()
fail_and_close:
hid_hw_close(hdev);
fail_and_stop:
hid_hw_stop(hdev);
drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c:corsairpsu_probe()
fail_and_close:
hid_hw_close(hdev);
fail_and_stop:
hid_hw_stop(hdev);
Do these drivers also need to call hid_device_io_stop(hdev) to prevent
hid_input_report() from executing after device structures are freed?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260708015806.213790-1-linux@roeck-us.net?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 2:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 1:58 [PATCH 0/4] Fix error handling in HID device probe functions Guenter Roeck
2026-07-08 1:58 ` [PATCH 1/4] hwmon: (corsair-cpro) Stop device IO before calling hid_hw_stop Guenter Roeck
2026-07-08 2:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 1:58 ` [PATCH 2/4] hwmon: (gigabyte_waterforce) " Guenter Roeck
2026-07-08 2:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 1:58 ` [PATCH 3/4] hwmon: (nzxt-smart2) " Guenter Roeck
2026-07-08 2:11 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-08 1:58 ` [PATCH 4/4] hwmon: (nzxt-kraken3) " Guenter Roeck
2026-07-08 2:10 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260708021117.0CC251F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox