Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (asus-ec-sensors) add missed handle for ENOMEM

[sashiko-bot@kernel.org]

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The newly added error handling incorrectly returns `status` (which evaluates to 0) instead of the actual error code when `asus_ec_hwmon_add_chan_info()` fails.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] hwmon: (asus-ec-sensors) add missed handle for ENOMEM ---
commit 2fb0c06e28b3b0aad223266de4f30ef04ff0537b
Author: Eugene Shalygin <eugene.shalygin@gmail.com>

hwmon: (asus-ec-sensors) add missed handle for ENOMEM
    
This commit adds a missing return value check in the setup function
asus_ec_probe() to handle potential memory allocation failures.

> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/asus-ec-sensors.c b/drivers/hwmon/asus-ec-sensors.c
> index 29a23484cbe7b..dd8c1a3f182e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/asus-ec-sensors.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/asus-ec-sensors.c
> @@ -1495,9 +1495,10 @@ static int asus_ec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		if (!nr_count[type])
>  			continue;
>  
> -		asus_ec_hwmon_add_chan_info(asus_ec_hwmon_chan, dev,
> -					     nr_count[type], type,
> -					     hwmon_attributes[type]);
> +		if (asus_ec_hwmon_add_chan_info(asus_ec_hwmon_chan, dev,
> +						nr_count[type], type,
> +						hwmon_attributes[type]))
> +			return status;

[Severity: High]
Does this correctly return the error code? At this point in asus_ec_probe(),
status appears to be 0 from the earlier successful call to setup_lock_data().

Should this capture and return the actual error code from
asus_ec_hwmon_add_chan_info() instead, to avoid returning success (0) while
aborting the probe?

>  		*ptr_asus_ec_ci++ = asus_ec_hwmon_chan++;
>  	}

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260712125147.1254339-1-eugene.shalygin@gmail.com?part=1