From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9811C2DC331 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 01:27:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785288449; cv=none; b=hIv1bYGQjAE/FTWSp+M4jqAt9gernVOL18JA2ycrRYcpf4fSWMt3Tc9YtDMG0SYJV6ct6D6pDNkqbSzq5v/0AWEdTcFawgtiDdoA22mLNvZILCMB0TFsujTOMNF9jg1OP1uRZs2YEnDSJXxUO0y731kixlL5o/rwsywbqJ89+l4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785288449; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IeMBlOhssqdC4H1HgvZqKAKnBupYDOEuHWE+jpIr3ZE=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=fr649R+6dbuuqTdJHwnZUmgg9fX+Zd3By3Sxe6RqtAhRYwZOCjKVEwe9DWF01uwRQOcrkpOolJrFiuSQ5JlzjcE9NM/Cu2AON/YxNggfPnSq38mclN2gA5boIBJDiCWnmbPEgef4hNb5NvhGWfSRnozyRlD3HH+fNhmD1dsd8yM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=TZihClXm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="TZihClXm" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EED5F1F000E9; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 01:27:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1785288448; bh=IeMBlOhssqdC4H1HgvZqKAKnBupYDOEuHWE+jpIr3ZE=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=TZihClXm4khl9fMFPkIaIjgkA7eOmT4g7NCxTtP+nZAVEYRtqepyqB4SC2sz7UHQo RGnkoLzi+Nm5+a9X1f7jzmBCKGspYte6G/8DjroAh31njggBbUl5/VtK2nXS9U9NJ8 BJEzpQ+6hvKmkqS7tTLhr0228hVDx1gMgY19/7AJW29QIGLrzFzLpgxFHd0mO31pfB MGezuBNS7GuM9emnX/uycTLcZEQfrq1lOZ/c6TiIj5LAVAxKH0I+1gqU08O1zK+DZy 8oJZ8s9mU8ugfmt53VukZ22uKklvsxU9mp5mCO/Rxg4bLQzpmhlz2i55wBejnFs1PM HU1gja+M/jw2g== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (pmbus) Let PMBus drivers report the supported PMBus revision Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Guenter Roeck" Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260729011914.4018703-1-linux@roeck-us.net> References: <20260729011914.4018703-1-linux@roeck-us.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 01:27:27 +0000 Message-Id: <20260729012727.EED5F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Some PMBus chips do not support the PMBUS_REVISION command. Knowing > the PMBUs revision supported by a chip is relevant for PMBUs core > functionality, so add support for letting chip drivers report the PMBUs > revision. >=20 > Use the new capability to report the PMBus revision supported by MAX20830. >=20 > While at it, add definitions for PMBUs revisons 1.3.1 and 1.4. >=20 > Cc: Nuno S=C3=A1 > Cc: Alexis Czezar Torreno > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260729011914.4018= 703-1-linux@roeck-us.net?part=3D1