From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Wilken Gottwalt" <wilken.gottwalt@posteo.net>
Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: corsair-psu: fix possible out-of-bounds access on missing string termination
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2026 07:30:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805073034.C71C01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <anLj9gPWRoRDbQBV@monster.localdomain>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Data race on shared `priv->cmd_buffer` and `priv->wait_completion` due to missing driver-level locking for debugfs attributes.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] hwmon: corsair-psu: fix possible out-of-bounds access on missing string termination ---
commit cfc2e894e816ca1d7330d9074123e16e3ad443b7
Author: Wilken Gottwalt <wilken.gottwalt@posteo.net>
hwmon: corsair-psu: fix possible out-of-bounds access on missing string termination
This commit limits the debugfs seq_printf() calls for vendor and product
strings to a maximum length of REPLY_SIZE. This prevents potential
out-of-bounds accesses if the strings are not properly null-terminated by
the hardware.
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c b/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c
> index ce958cdaef58a..3c01ae3fc4af2 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c
> @@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ static int vendor_show(struct seq_file *seqf, void *unused)
> {
> struct corsairpsu_data *priv = seqf->private;
>
> - seq_printf(seqf, "%s\n", priv->vendor);
> + seq_printf(seqf, "%.*s\n", REPLY_SIZE, priv->vendor);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -711,7 +711,7 @@ static int product_show(struct seq_file *seqf, void *unused)
> {
> struct corsairpsu_data *priv = seqf->private;
>
> - seq_printf(seqf, "%s\n", priv->product);
> + seq_printf(seqf, "%.*s\n", REPLY_SIZE, priv->product);
>
> return 0;
> }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the lack of driver-level locking
cause a data race on priv->cmd_buffer and priv->wait_completion when debugfs
attributes are read concurrently with sysfs attributes?
Looking at print_uptime(), it calls into corsairpsu_get_value() bypassing
the hwmon core sysfs locks:
drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c:print_uptime() {
...
ret = corsairpsu_get_value(priv, cmd, 0, &val);
...
}
This proceeds into corsairpsu_usb_cmd() where the shared buffer and
completion are mutated without any synchronization lock:
drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c:corsairpsu_usb_cmd() {
...
memset(priv->cmd_buffer, 0, CMD_BUFFER_SIZE);
priv->cmd_buffer[0] = p0;
priv->cmd_buffer[1] = p1;
priv->cmd_buffer[2] = p2;
reinit_completion(&priv->wait_completion);
...
}
The hwmon subsystem requires drivers to implement internal locking for
attributes registered outside the core, such as debugfs interfaces. Without
a transaction lock, interleaved USB commands can corrupt hardware state and
result in mismatched telemetry data.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/anLj9gPWRoRDbQBV@monster.localdomain?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-05 7:19 [PATCH] hwmon: corsair-psu: fix possible out-of-bounds access on missing string termination Wilken Gottwalt
2026-08-05 7:30 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-05 14:51 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260805073034.C71C01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wilken.gottwalt@posteo.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox