Linux Hardware Monitor development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arie Miller" <renari@arimil.com>
Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] hwmon: (asus_rog_ryujin) Add ROG Ryujin III White Edition
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 10:43:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260812104312.EA98D1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812103532.395049-4-renari@arimil.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing bounds check on incoming HID report data in raw_event callback, leading to out-of-bounds read.
--

--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v3 3/3] hwmon: (asus_rog_ryujin) Add ROG Ryujin III White Edition ---
commit c24d3645c70fad1763a76ddee1293e1040bce990
Author: Will Smith <github@notthatwillsmith.com>
Subject: hwmon: (asus_rog_ryujin) Add ROG Ryujin III White Edition

This commit adds support for the ROG Ryujin III White Edition cooler by
adding its USB product ID to the asus_rog_ryujin driver. It utilizes the
same report layout as the other Ryujin III variants.

Link: https://github.com/aleksamagicka/asus_rog_ryujin-hwmon/pull/10

> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/asus_rog_ryujin.c b/drivers/hwmon/asus_rog_ryujin.c
> index 79e5b6d6dae0a..702edb8313945 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/asus_rog_ryujin.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/asus_rog_ryujin.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -590,6 +591,8 @@ static const struct hid_device_id rog_ryujin_table[] = {
>  	  .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&rog_ryujin_iii_info },
>  	{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ASUS_ROG, USB_PRODUCT_ID_RYUJIN_III_EVA),
>  	  .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&rog_ryujin_iii_info },
> +	{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ASUS_ROG, USB_PRODUCT_ID_RYUJIN_III_WHITE),
> +	  .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&rog_ryujin_iii_info },

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does adding this new device expose it to an
out-of-bounds read in rog_ryujin_raw_event()?

If the new device sends a short report or has a short report descriptor,
rog_ryujin_raw_event() accesses data buffers without checking the size first:

drivers/hwmon/asus_rog_ryujin.c:rog_ryujin_raw_event() {
	struct rog_ryujin_data *priv = hid_get_drvdata(hdev);

	if (data[0] != RYUJIN_CMD_PREFIX)
		return 0;
...
}

Would a malicious USB device sending a short report trigger a slab
out-of-bounds read here, or when reading larger offsets like
priv->info->fan_speed_offset? Should there be a size validation check
added to the raw event handler?

>  	{ }
>  };

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260812103532.395049-1-renari@arimil.com?part=3

      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-12 10:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-12 10:35 [PATCH v3 0/3] hwmon: Add ASUS ROG Ryujin III support Arie Miller
2026-08-12 10:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] hwmon: (asus_rog_ryujin) Add per-device configuration Arie Miller
2026-08-12 10:45   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 10:35 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] hwmon: (asus_rog_ryujin) Add ROG Ryujin III support Arie Miller
2026-08-12 10:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 10:35 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] hwmon: (asus_rog_ryujin) Add ROG Ryujin III White Edition Arie Miller
2026-08-12 10:43   ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260812104312.EA98D1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=renari@arimil.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox