From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Armin Wolf" <W_Armin@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (spd5118) Select page 0 unconditionally during probe
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 23:19:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260830231944.9A0F01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260830231036.203719-1-W_Armin@gmx.de>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Unsafe unconditional I2C write during probe before device verification risks permanent data corruption on unrelated devices.
- [Medium] The I2C write to select page 0 unintentionally clears bits 7:4 of the legacy mode register due to an incorrect bitmask.
--
commit 270ea09e9966102e26a3fc6a4bba86ec060d0e37
Author: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
hwmon: (spd5118) Select page 0 unconditionally during probe
This commit modifies the probe sequence of the spd5118 driver to
unconditionally select page 0 before attempting to read the device type
register. This change is intended to bypass BIOS-level restrictions on I2C
writes to the SPD device and properly handle chips that restrict access to
volatile registers when a non-zero page is selected.
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/spd5118.c b/drivers/hwmon/spd5118.c
> index 9724cf70b61d4..65a0d5852ce86 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/spd5118.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/spd5118.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -637,45 +637,32 @@ static int spd5118_i2c_init(struct i2c_client *client)
[ ... ]
> + mode = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, SPD5118_REG_I2C_LEGACY_MODE);
> + if (mode < 0)
> + return mode;
> +
> + err = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, SPD5118_REG_I2C_LEGACY_MODE,
> + mode & SPD5118_LEGACY_MODE_ADDR);
[Severity: High]
Does this unconditional write execute before any device identity checks,
creating a risk of data corruption for incorrectly bound devices?
If this driver binds to an incorrect I2C device, such as a standard DDR4 SPD
EEPROM residing at the same 0x50-0x57 address range, it will blindly overwrite
byte 0x0B of the device before verifying its identity.
[Severity: Medium]
Does this bitwise AND inadvertently zero out bits 7:4 of the legacy mode
register?
The masking operation mode & SPD5118_LEGACY_MODE_ADDR effectively masks out
all bits except bit 3, forcing bits 7:4 (and bits 2:0) to zero. In the
previous implementation, the driver explicitly verified that bits 7:4 were
zero before applying this mask. With that check removed, any device with bits
7:4 set will have them silently wiped out.
To safely clear only the page bits (2:0), should the mask logically be
mode & ~SPD5118_LEGACY_PAGE_MASK?
> + if (err < 0)
> + return err;
> +
> + regval = i2c_smbus_read_word_swapped(client, SPD5118_REG_TYPE);
> + if (regval < 0)
> + return regval;
> +
> + if (regval != 0x5118)
> + return -ENODEV;
[Severity: High]
If the type mismatch occurs here, the probe aborts without rolling back the
write to SPD5118_REG_I2C_LEGACY_MODE. Does this leak the state modification
to misidentified devices?
>
> /* We are reasonably sure that this is really a SPD5118 hub controller */
> return 0;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260830231036.203719-1-W_Armin@gmx.de?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-30 23:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-30 23:10 [PATCH] hwmon: (spd5118) Select page 0 unconditionally during probe Armin Wolf
2026-08-30 23:19 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260830231944.9A0F01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=W_Armin@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox