Linux Hardware Monitor development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Tom Verdonck" <tom.verdonck@inspiral.be>
Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] hwmon: (sht4x) Fix jiffies wraparound in heater-ready check
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 18:33:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260925183328.3BAC91F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7b2087ccb963e097cf3f6333efaec0c46549003b.1790358356.git.tom.verdonck@inspiral.be>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] hwmon: (sht4x): torn read of heating_complete in heater_enable_show()
--

commit 90157fd25e4d294f6299c304227e07d23632d8e9
Author: Tom Verdonck <tom.verdonck@inspiral.be>

hwmon: (sht4x) Fix jiffies wraparound in heater-ready check

This commit changes the heating_complete field to a 64-bit jiffies
value to prevent wraparound issues after ~248.5 days on 32-bit systems.
It updates usages of this field to use get_jiffies_64() and
time_before64().

> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/sht4x.c b/drivers/hwmon/sht4x.c
> index a97dda9e92dc5..da2b6130fca7e 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/sht4x.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/sht4x.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static ssize_t heater_enable_show(struct device *dev,
>  {
>  	struct sht4x_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>  
> -	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", time_before(jiffies, data->heating_complete));
> +	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", time_before64(get_jiffies_64(), data->heating_complete));
[Severity: Medium]
Since heating_complete is now a 64-bit field, does this read in
heater_enable_show() need to be protected by hwmon_lock?

If a user-space read to the heater_enable sysfs attribute runs concurrently
with a write via heater_enable_store(), it would race with the update to
data->heating_complete which is done under the lock.

Could this result in a torn read of data->heating_complete on 32-bit
architectures, causing an incorrect boolean value to be emitted?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1790358356.git.tom.verdonck@inspiral.be?part=3

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-25 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-25 18:23 [PATCH 0/3] hwmon: fix jiffies wraparound in one-shot ready checks Tom Verdonck
2026-09-25 18:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] hwmon: (tmp102) Fix jiffies wraparound in conversion-ready check Tom Verdonck
2026-09-25 18:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-26  3:25   ` Guenter Roeck
2026-09-25 18:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] hwmon: (tmp108) " Tom Verdonck
2026-09-25 18:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-26  3:26   ` Guenter Roeck
2026-09-25 18:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] hwmon: (sht4x) Fix jiffies wraparound in heater-ready check Tom Verdonck
2026-09-25 18:33   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-26  3:27   ` Guenter Roeck
2026-09-28  6:22   ` [PATCH] hwmon: (sht4x) Fix torn read of heating_complete in heater_enable_show() Tom Verdonck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260925183328.3BAC91F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tom.verdonck@inspiral.be \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox