From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Tom Verdonck" <tom.verdonck@inspiral.be>
Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] hwmon: (sht4x) Fix jiffies wraparound in heater-ready check
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 18:33:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260925183328.3BAC91F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7b2087ccb963e097cf3f6333efaec0c46549003b.1790358356.git.tom.verdonck@inspiral.be>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] hwmon: (sht4x): torn read of heating_complete in heater_enable_show()
--
commit 90157fd25e4d294f6299c304227e07d23632d8e9
Author: Tom Verdonck <tom.verdonck@inspiral.be>
hwmon: (sht4x) Fix jiffies wraparound in heater-ready check
This commit changes the heating_complete field to a 64-bit jiffies
value to prevent wraparound issues after ~248.5 days on 32-bit systems.
It updates usages of this field to use get_jiffies_64() and
time_before64().
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/sht4x.c b/drivers/hwmon/sht4x.c
> index a97dda9e92dc5..da2b6130fca7e 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/sht4x.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/sht4x.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static ssize_t heater_enable_show(struct device *dev,
> {
> struct sht4x_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>
> - return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", time_before(jiffies, data->heating_complete));
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", time_before64(get_jiffies_64(), data->heating_complete));
[Severity: Medium]
Since heating_complete is now a 64-bit field, does this read in
heater_enable_show() need to be protected by hwmon_lock?
If a user-space read to the heater_enable sysfs attribute runs concurrently
with a write via heater_enable_store(), it would race with the update to
data->heating_complete which is done under the lock.
Could this result in a torn read of data->heating_complete on 32-bit
architectures, causing an incorrect boolean value to be emitted?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1790358356.git.tom.verdonck@inspiral.be?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-25 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-25 18:23 [PATCH 0/3] hwmon: fix jiffies wraparound in one-shot ready checks Tom Verdonck
2026-09-25 18:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] hwmon: (tmp102) Fix jiffies wraparound in conversion-ready check Tom Verdonck
2026-09-25 18:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-26 3:25 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-09-25 18:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] hwmon: (tmp108) " Tom Verdonck
2026-09-25 18:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-26 3:26 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-09-25 18:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] hwmon: (sht4x) Fix jiffies wraparound in heater-ready check Tom Verdonck
2026-09-25 18:33 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-26 3:27 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-09-28 6:22 ` [PATCH] hwmon: (sht4x) Fix torn read of heating_complete in heater_enable_show() Tom Verdonck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260925183328.3BAC91F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tom.verdonck@inspiral.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox