From: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
To: james@equiv.tech, markpearson@lenovo.com, jorge.lopez2@hp.com
Cc: jdelvare@suse.com, linux@roeck-us.net,
linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
hdegoede@redhat.com, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] platform/x86: think-lmi: Use ACPI object when extracting strings
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 01:31:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <33eac2f8-b295-4716-a5f8-9f0bf7f6d349@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250203182322.384883-3-W_Armin@gmx.de>
Am 03.02.25 um 19:23 schrieb Armin Wolf:
> Move the ACPI buffer handling out of tlmi_extract_output_string()
> and instead pass the unpacked ACPI object to prepare for future
> changes.
Hi,
i was hoping that maybe the driver maintainer could take a look at this patch
and give some feedback.
Thanks,
Armin Wolf
> Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
> index 323316ac6783..2c94a4af9a1d 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
> @@ -262,16 +262,11 @@ static int tlmi_simple_call(const char *guid, const char *arg)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -/* Extract output string from WMI return buffer */
> -static int tlmi_extract_output_string(const struct acpi_buffer *output,
> - char **string)
> +/* Extract output string from WMI return value */
> +static int tlmi_extract_output_string(union acpi_object *obj, char **string)
> {
> - const union acpi_object *obj;
> char *s;
>
> - obj = output->pointer;
> - if (!obj)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_STRING || !obj->string.pointer)
> return -EIO;
>
> @@ -352,17 +347,21 @@ static int tlmi_opcode_setting(char *setting, const char *value)
> static int tlmi_setting(int item, char **value, const char *guid_string)
> {
> struct acpi_buffer output = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
> + union acpi_object *obj;
> acpi_status status;
> int ret;
>
> status = wmi_query_block(guid_string, item, &output);
> - if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> - kfree(output.pointer);
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> return -EIO;
> - }
>
> - ret = tlmi_extract_output_string(&output, value);
> - kfree(output.pointer);
> + obj = output.pointer;
> + if (!obj)
> + return -ENODATA;
> +
> + ret = tlmi_extract_output_string(obj, value);
> + kfree(obj);
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -370,19 +369,22 @@ static int tlmi_get_bios_selections(const char *item, char **value)
> {
> const struct acpi_buffer input = { strlen(item), (char *)item };
> struct acpi_buffer output = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
> + union acpi_object *obj;
> acpi_status status;
> int ret;
>
> status = wmi_evaluate_method(LENOVO_GET_BIOS_SELECTIONS_GUID,
> 0, 0, &input, &output);
> -
> - if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> - kfree(output.pointer);
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> return -EIO;
> - }
>
> - ret = tlmi_extract_output_string(&output, value);
> - kfree(output.pointer);
> + obj = output.pointer;
> + if (!obj)
> + return -ENODATA;
> +
> + ret = tlmi_extract_output_string(obj, value);
> + kfree(obj);
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> --
> 2.39.5
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-10 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-03 18:23 [PATCH 0/7] platform/x86: wmi: Rework WMI device enabling Armin Wolf
2025-02-03 18:23 ` [PATCH 1/7] hwmon: (hp-wmi-sensors) Use the WMI bus API when accessing sensors Armin Wolf
2025-02-04 0:41 ` James Seo
2025-02-04 1:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-02-04 9:41 ` Armin Wolf
2025-02-03 18:23 ` [PATCH 2/7] platform/x86: think-lmi: Use ACPI object when extracting strings Armin Wolf
2025-02-10 0:31 ` Armin Wolf [this message]
2025-02-11 16:46 ` Mark Pearson
2025-02-03 18:23 ` [PATCH 3/7] platform/x86: think-lmi: Use WMI bus API when accessing BIOS settings Armin Wolf
2025-02-13 13:17 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-02-14 3:07 ` Armin Wolf
2025-02-03 18:23 ` [PATCH 4/7] platform/x86: hp-bioscfg: Use wmi_instance_count() Armin Wolf
2025-02-04 10:37 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-02-04 13:06 ` Armin Wolf
2025-02-04 14:27 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-02-03 18:23 ` [PATCH 5/7] platform/x86: wmi: Rework WCxx/WExx ACPI method handling Armin Wolf
2025-02-03 18:23 ` [PATCH 6/7] platform/x86: wmi: Call WCxx methods when setting data blocks Armin Wolf
2025-02-03 18:23 ` [PATCH 7/7] platform/x86: wmi: Update documentation regarding the GUID-based API Armin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=33eac2f8-b295-4716-a5f8-9f0bf7f6d349@gmx.de \
--to=w_armin@gmx.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=james@equiv.tech \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=jorge.lopez2@hp.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=markpearson@lenovo.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox