From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Rong Zhang <i@rong.moe>, Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>,
"Derek J. Clark" <derekjohn.clark@gmail.com>,
Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>, Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>,
oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/7] platform/x86: lenovo-wmi-{capdata,other}: Support multiple Capability Data
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 10:51:34 +0200 (EET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55186ed3-bf74-6c34-1350-51046306083a@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202601140833.WJ1oZKuV-lkp@intel.com>
On Wed, 14 Jan 2026, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Rong,
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on b71e635feefc852405b14620a7fc58c4c80c0f73]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Rong-Zhang/platform-x86-lenovo-wmi-helpers-Convert-returned-buffer-into-u32/20260114-013537
> base: b71e635feefc852405b14620a7fc58c4c80c0f73
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260113172817.393856-4-i%40rong.moe
> patch subject: [PATCH v8 3/7] platform/x86: lenovo-wmi-{capdata,other}: Support multiple Capability Data
> config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-002-20260114 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260114/202601140833.WJ1oZKuV-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260114/202601140833.WJ1oZKuV-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202601140833.WJ1oZKuV-lkp@intel.com/
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> >> Warning: drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/wmi-capdata.c:168 function parameter '_cdxx' not described in 'DEF_LWMI_CDXX_GET_DATA'
> >> Warning: drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/wmi-capdata.c:168 function parameter '_cd_type' not described in 'DEF_LWMI_CDXX_GET_DATA'
> >> Warning: drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/wmi-capdata.c:168 function parameter '_output_t' not described in 'DEF_LWMI_CDXX_GET_DATA'
> >> Warning: drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/wmi-capdata.c:168 expecting prototype for _get_data(). Prototype was for DEF_LWMI_CDXX_GET_DATA() instead
These are quite annoying. Could you make it non-kerneldoc by removing the
second * from /**, so it won't trigger these warnings?
--
i.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-14 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-13 17:28 [PATCH v8 0/7] platform/x86: lenovo-wmi-{capdata,other}: Add HWMON for fan speed Rong Zhang
2026-01-13 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 1/7] platform/x86: lenovo-wmi-helpers: Convert returned buffer into u32 Rong Zhang
2026-01-13 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 2/7] platform/x86: Rename lenovo-wmi-capdata01 to lenovo-wmi-capdata Rong Zhang
2026-01-13 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 3/7] platform/x86: lenovo-wmi-{capdata,other}: Support multiple Capability Data Rong Zhang
2026-01-14 0:48 ` kernel test robot
2026-01-14 8:51 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2026-01-13 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 4/7] platform/x86: lenovo-wmi-capdata: Add support for Capability Data 00 Rong Zhang
2026-01-13 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 5/7] platform/x86: lenovo-wmi-capdata: Add support for Fan Test Data Rong Zhang
2026-01-13 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 6/7] platform/x86: lenovo-wmi-capdata: Wire up " Rong Zhang
2026-01-13 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 7/7] platform/x86: lenovo-wmi-other: Add HWMON for fan reporting/tuning Rong Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55186ed3-bf74-6c34-1350-51046306083a@linux.intel.com \
--to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=W_Armin@gmx.de \
--cc=derekjohn.clark@gmail.com \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=i@rong.moe \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox