Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH v3 00/25] hwmon: (it87) Various enhancements and fixes

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH v3 00/25] hwmon: (it87) Various enhancements and fixes

[Guenter Roeck]

Hi Martin,

On 04/09/2016 02:33 AM, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> Guenter Roeck <patchwork <at> patchwork.roeck-us.net> writes:
>> From: Guenter Roeck <linux <at> roeck-us.net>
>>
>> This patch series builds on top of v4.5-rc1. The series was tested on
>> a system with IT8728F. Out-of-kernel versions were tested by various
>> people using a github repository.
> I've been running the whole series on top of v4.5 for the past two
> weeks on a system with IT8628E. I did not find any problems so far.
>

thanks a lot for the feedback. It would be great if you can send me
an official Tested-by: that I can add into the series (or a permission
to do so).

With the experience gained with the off-list driver, I think this series
is good to go for upstream, even without code review feedback. Otherwise
I fear we'll never get there. Jean, any objections ?

Thanks,
Guenter


_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH v3 00/25] hwmon: (it87) Various enhancements and fixes

[Martin Blumenstingl]

On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>>> This patch series builds on top of v4.5-rc1. The series was tested on
>>> a system with IT8728F. Out-of-kernel versions were tested by various
>>> people using a github repository.
>>
>> I've been running the whole series on top of v4.5 for the past two
>> weeks on a system with IT8628E. I did not find any problems so far.
>>
>
> thanks a lot for the feedback. It would be great if you can send me
> an official Tested-by: that I can add into the series (or a permission
> to do so).
sure, feel free to add this to the whole series:
Tested-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>

PS: Thank you Guenter for your hard work on this!

Re: [PATCH v3 00/25] hwmon: (it87) Various enhancements and fixes

[Jean Delvare]

Hi Guenter,

On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 08:07:27 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> 
> On 04/09/2016 02:33 AM, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> > Guenter Roeck <patchwork <at> patchwork.roeck-us.net> writes:
> >> From: Guenter Roeck <linux <at> roeck-us.net>
> >>
> >> This patch series builds on top of v4.5-rc1. The series was tested on
> >> a system with IT8728F. Out-of-kernel versions were tested by various
> >> people using a github repository.
> > I've been running the whole series on top of v4.5 for the past two
> > weeks on a system with IT8628E. I did not find any problems so far.
> 
> thanks a lot for the feedback. It would be great if you can send me
> an official Tested-by: that I can add into the series (or a permission
> to do so).
> 
> With the experience gained with the off-list driver, I think this series
> is good to go for upstream, even without code review feedback. Otherwise
> I fear we'll never get there. Jean, any objections ?

I am sorry that I do not have the time to review this patch series. But
I trust your judgment and I have no objection, if you think the series
is good to go upstream then please push it there.

Thanks,
-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support

Re: [PATCH v3 00/25] hwmon: (it87) Various enhancements and fixes

[Guenter Roeck]

On 04/12/2016 12:21 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 08:07:27 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> On 04/09/2016 02:33 AM, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
>>> Guenter Roeck <patchwork <at> patchwork.roeck-us.net> writes:
>>>> From: Guenter Roeck <linux <at> roeck-us.net>
>>>>
>>>> This patch series builds on top of v4.5-rc1. The series was tested on
>>>> a system with IT8728F. Out-of-kernel versions were tested by various
>>>> people using a github repository.
>>> I've been running the whole series on top of v4.5 for the past two
>>> weeks on a system with IT8628E. I did not find any problems so far.
>>
>> thanks a lot for the feedback. It would be great if you can send me
>> an official Tested-by: that I can add into the series (or a permission
>> to do so).
>>
>> With the experience gained with the off-list driver, I think this series
>> is good to go for upstream, even without code review feedback. Otherwise
>> I fear we'll never get there. Jean, any objections ?
>
> I am sorry that I do not have the time to review this patch series. But
> I trust your judgment and I have no objection, if you think the series
> is good to go upstream then please push it there.
>
No need to be sorry. We are all busy.

Thanks!
Guenter